HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Harlan
Filing
12
MINUTE ORDER; Plaintiff's 10 Request to Appear Telephonically at Scheduling Conference is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/25/2013.(klmcd, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00508-WYD-KLM
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
MITCHELL HARLAN, also known as Mitchell W. Harlan,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Request to Appear Telephonically at
Scheduling Conference [Docket No. 10; Filed March 25, 2013] (the “Motion”). As an initial
matter, the Motion does not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. Nevertheless, in the interest of
expedience,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#10] is GRANTED. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s counsel may appear by telephone at the
Scheduling Conference on June 25, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. by dialing the Court at 303-3352770. If any other parties are granted leave to appear telephonically, these parties must
initiate a conference call between themselves and Plaintiff’s counsel before dialing the
Court.
Dated: March 25, 2013
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
