Bartnick et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Filing
77
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/04/13 adopting Report and Recommendations re 50 Report and Recommendations which DENIES 27 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Pro Se Plaintiffs. Plaintiff's objections are overru led. It is further ORDERED that the Amended Complaint filed on March 1, 2013 (Docket No. 75), is STRICKEN due to the plaintiffs failure to comply Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) which permits such an amendment only with the opposing partys written consent or the courts leave. Plaintiffs have not shown that they have obtained defendants consent to file the Amended Complaint, nor have the plaintiffs filed a motion to file such a pleading.(nmmsl, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03208-MJW
WILLIAM BARTNICK and
LAURA LARKINS BARTNICK,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendant(s).
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that based upon the Order of Reference Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636 issued by Judge Jackson on February 28, 2013 (Docket No. 73), this
court’s Recommendation on Pro Se Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Injunction from
Garnishment and Levy (Docket No. 27), which was issued on January 22, 2013 (Docket
No. 50), is made an Order of this court. Plaintiffs’ objections thereto (Docket No. 53)
are overruled.
It is further ORDERED that the Amended Complaint filed on March 1, 2013
(Docket No. 75), is STRICKEN due to the plaintiffs’ failure to comply Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a)(2) which permits such an amendment only with the opposing party’s written
consent or the court’s leave. Plaintiffs have not shown that they have obtained
defendant’s consent to file the Amended Complaint, nor have the plaintiffs filed a motion
to file such a pleading.
Date: March 4, 2013
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
