Bell v. Falk et al, No. 1:2012cv02917 - Document 27 (D. Colo. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Francis Falk against Gregory Bell re: 26 Order Dismissing Case, by Clerk on 7/17/2013. (klyon, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bell v. Falk et al Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02917-REB GREGORY BELL, Applicant, v. FRANCIS FALK, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents. FINAL JUDGMENT This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in accordance with the Order on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus [#26] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on July 16, 2013, which order is incorporated herein by this reference. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the pro se Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [# 1], filed November 6, 2012, by Applicant Gregory Bell, is DENIED; 2. That this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. That there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); and 4. That leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied; provided, further that Applicant may file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Dockets.Justia.com DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 17th day of July, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
