Miller v. Best Buy, Co., Inc.
Filing
34
MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Motion to Clarify. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of Doc. No. 29 . The defendants are ORDERED to send copies of the motions to dismiss and briefs in support of the motions to dismiss to Plaintiff at t he address listed in the Court's docket no later than March 8, 2013, and to file a certificate of service regarding the same. Defendants shall serve Plaintiff with any other electronically filed documents according to the local and federal ru les. Plaintiff may respond to the Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 22 and 24 ) on or before April 1, 2013. Defendants may reply in accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR7.1C. The Scheduling Conference and other deadlines set in the Order Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 26 (f) Planning Meeting (Doc. No. 30 ) will not be continued. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 03/07/13. (alvsl)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 12–cv–02535–RBJ–KMT
RON MILLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BEST BUY CO., INC.,
HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION, INC., and
HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A.,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
This matter is before the court on “Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification of Magistrate’s Order
Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference” (Doc. No. 32, filed March 6, 2013). The motion is
GRANTED.
Default was not entered as to the defendants because an affidavit or declaration required by Fed.
R. Civ. P. 55 was not filed, and the defendants, who have filed motions to dismiss on February 5,
2013 (Doc. Nos. 22 and 24), have “otherwise defended” pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a) and
(b). (See Doc. No. 29.) The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of Doc. No. 29.
The court notes that the defendants did not comply with the local and federal rules in serving
Plaintiff with the motions to dismiss. Plaintiff is not registered in the Court’s Electronic Case
Filing system. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 5.7E. of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures for the
United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Defendants must serve copies of
electronically filed pleadings, documents, or proposed orders according to the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, and include a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing to provide the Plaintiff
with proof of the filing. Therefore, the defendants are ORDERED to send copies of the motions
to dismiss and briefs in support of the motions to dismiss to Plaintiff at the address listed in the
Court’s docket no later than March 8, 2013, and to file a certificate of service regarding the
same. Defendants shall serve Plaintiff with any other electronically filed documents according
to the local and federal rules.
Plaintiff may respond to the Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 22 and 24) on or before April 1,
2013. Defendants may reply in accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR7.1C.
The Scheduling Conference and other deadlines set in the Order Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling
Conference and Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Doc. No. 30) will not be continued.
Dated: March 7, 2013
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
