Williams v. Takhar Collection Services LTD., et al

Filing 28

AMENDED ORDER Granting 23 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Takhar Collection Services LTD. and re: 27 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify, filed by Norman Williams. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 03/08/13. (alvsl)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable R. Brooke Jackson Civil Action No. 12-cv-02327-RBJ NORMAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. TAKHAR COLLECTION SERVICES, LTD., and DOE 1-5, Defendants. AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ATTORNEY’S FEES The matter before the Court is Plaintiff Norman William’s Motion for Default Judgment against Takhar Collection Services, LTD. (“Defendant”) pursuant to FRCP Rule 55(b)(2). PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed suit against Defendant alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq.). Defendant was served with the lawsuit on September 4, 2012. Defendant failed to file a responsive pleading or otherwise appear in any 1 manner. Defendant did not contact Plaintiff. On September 28, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Request for Entry of Default, which the Court entered on October 1, 2012. Defendant did not move to set aside the Entry of Default or otherwise appear. Due to a deficiency, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on December 5, 2012. Defendant was served with a second summons on December 12, 2011. On January 7, 2013, a second Clerk’s Entry of Default was entered against Defendant. Defendant did not move to set aside the second Entry of Default or otherwise appear. PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT SUPPORTS A CLAIM FOR RELIEF Plaintiff’s allegations are sufficient to show that Defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Plaintiff’s allegations may be taken as true in the absence of Defendant’s response. DAMAGES The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act provides for statutory damages as the court may allow, but not exceeding $1,000; any actual damage sustained by such person, and the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court. (15 U.S.C. 1692k). Plaintiff seeks $1,000 in statutory damages, $360.90 in costs, and $2,350.00 in attorney’s fees. Plaintiff has sufficiently pled violations of the 15 U.S.C. 1692b and 1692d, and may therefore recover $1,000.00 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1692k(a)(2)(A). Plaintiff’s attorney has submitted a detailed billing summary accounting for $360.90 in costs and $2,350.00 in attorney’s fees. Commensurate with the average hourly rate in the region, Plaintiff’s attorney’s rate and therefore calculated fees are found to be reasonable. 2 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Norman Williams and against Takhar Collection Services, LTD. in the amount of $3,710.90. IT IS SO ORDERED on this 8th day of March, 2013. BY THE COURT: ________________________________ R. Brooke Jackson United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?