Kasel v. City and County of Denver, et al
Filing
27
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 3/5/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: City Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' 5 Amended Complaint 18 , is granted with respect to the 1983 claim and all other claims ar e dismissed without prejudice. Defendant Sharon Brown's Motion to Dismiss the Sixth, Eighth and Ninth Claims for Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(b)(6) and Motion for Definite Statement as to the Eighth Claim Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(e) 16 , is moot.FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
March 5, 2013
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02252-RPM
KASEL ASSOCIATES INDUSTRIES, INC., and
RAYMOND J. KASEL,
Phillip Parrott
Richard O. Campbell
Margaret R. Pflueger
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,
JUDY MONTERO,
STEPHANIE SYNER,
DOUGLAS LINKHART,
GARY J. LASSWELL,
SHARON BROWN,
EMILY VONSWEARINGEN,
MICHAEL ENSINGER, and
UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES AND
AGENTS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,
Joseph M. Rivera
Randall J. Paulsen
No appearance
No appearance
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Pending Motions
2:02 p.m.
Court in session.
Plaintiff Raymond J. Kasel and Kevin O’Toole are present.
Court’s preliminary remarks.
ORDERED:
Phillip Parrott appearance for plaintiffs is accepted.
2:04 p.m.
2:20 p.m.
2:28 p.m.
2:32 p.m.
Argument by Mr. Parrott.
Argument by Mr. Rivera.
Argument by Mr. Paulsen.
Rebuttal argument by Mr. Parrott.
ORDERED:
City Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ [5] Amended Complaint [18], is
granted with respect to the 1983 claim and all other claims are dismissed without
prejudice.
ORDERED:
Defendant Sharon Brown’s Motion to Dismiss the Sixth, Eighth and Ninth Claims
for Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(b)(6) and Motion for Definite Statement as
to the Eighth Claim Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(e) [16], is moot.
2:40 p.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 38 min.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
