Roberts v. Deutsche Bank AG, No. 1:2012cv02065 - Document 44 (D. Colo. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT The Magistrate Judges Recommendation ECF No. 42 is ADOPTED IN PART; The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) based on Plaintiffs failure to prosecute; The case is closed. Each party shall bear his or its own costs, by Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 4/10/2013. (ervsl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Roberts v. Deutsche Bank AG Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 12-cv-02065-WJM-KLM THOMAS ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. DEUTSCH BANK AG, PHILIP GORDON, and ARA BALIKIAN, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); all previous Orders entered in this case; and the Order Adopting In Part Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation And Dismissing Plaintiff’s Claims Without Prejudice, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on April 9, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 42) is ADOPTED IN PART; (2) The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) based on Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute; (3) The case is closed. Each party shall bear his or its own costs. Dockets.Justia.com Dated: April 10, 2013 at Denver, Colorado. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P . Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
