Wojdacz v. Colorado Springs City Police Department et al.
Filing
140
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 135 Defendant Gary Norman's Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Stop Interrogatories, and Motion to Stop Deposition, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/21/2013. (mehcd)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01483-REB-MEH
ELIZABETH WOJDACZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICER JOHN IRELAND,
PATRICK MILLER,
PENROSE ST. FRANCIS HEALTHCARE,
GARY LEE NORMAN,
MICHAEL J. DUNCAN, and
CLIFF HUDSON,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 21, 2013.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Gary Norman’s Motion to Dismiss[,] Motion to Stop
Interrogatories[,] and Motion to Stop Deposition [filed March 19, 2013; docket #135]. The Motion
is denied without prejudice for the following reasons.
First, Mr. Norman’s Motion fails to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1A, which requires
each motion to include a Certificate of Service indicating “the date it was served, the name and
address of the person to whom it was sent, and the manner of service.” Mr. Norman’s Motion states
only that the document was sent to Plaintiff and the other Defendants. This is not sufficient.
Second, due to its varied requests for relief, adjudication of the single Motion will likely
require different standards of review and legal analyses of both dispositive and non-dispositive
issues. In the interests of judicial efficiency and the proper management of its docket, the Court
instructs Mr. Norman to file his requests for relief each in separate motions, as applicable. See D.C.
Colo. LCivR 7.1C (“A motion shall be made in a separate paper.”) Those issues pertaining to
discovery may be addressed in a single motion for a protective order as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(c). However, Mr. Norman may only seek dismissal by separate motion.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
