Bartowsheski v. Timme, No. 1:2012cv01451 - Document 27 (D. Colo. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Respondent Rae Timme against Applicant Mike Bartowsheski re: Order 26 Adopting March 18, 2013 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge and Denying Plaintiff's Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 4/24/2013. (wjmcd, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bartowsheski v. Timme Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 12-cv-01451-WJM-BNB MIKE BARTOWSHESKI, Applicant, v. WARDEN RAE TIMME, Respondent. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all previous orders entered in this case and the Order Adopting March 18, 2013 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge and Denying Plaintiff’s Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on April 12, 2013, IT IS ORDERED THAT (1) The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) Plaintiff’s Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 6) is DENIED; (3) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In the United States District Courts, the Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability for any matters raised in the Amended Application; and Dockets.Justia.com (4) Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent. Each party shall bear his own costs. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 24th day of April, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
