Reed v. Clements et al, No. 1:2012cv00927 - Document 55 (D. Colo. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 53 Order. By Clerk on 6/5/13. (mnfsl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reed v. Clements et al Doc. 55 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-00927-MSK-MEH NORMAN RAY REED, JR., Plaintiff, v. MIKE TIDWELL, in his professional and individual capacities, EVE LITTLE, in her professional and individual capacities, CHARLES HIGGINS, in his professional and individual capacities, and MICHELLE NYCZ HALLIGAN, in her professional and individual capacities, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Text-Entry Order filed June 4, 2013 in the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system, adopting the Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #49) to dismiss the case for Plaintiff’s failure to pay required fees and failure to timely prosecute this case, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mix (Doc. #49) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s case is dismissed without prejudice, and the case is closed. It is further ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Dated this 5th day June, 2013. ENTERED FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
