Bynum v. Municipality, et al, No. 1:2012cv00064 - Document 89 (D. Colo. 2013)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that plaintiffs claims, the amended complaint and this civil action are dismissed with prejudice by Clerk on 03/13/13. (jjhsl, )

Download PDF
Bynum v. Municipality, et al Doc. 89 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-00064-WYD-MJW CECIL BYNUM, Plaintiff, v. MUNICIPALITY, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER; KERI JOHNSON; DAVID RYAN; AP RICHMOND; J. CASIAS; J. ANDREWS; J. SIMMONS; and, ROBERT HART, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed on March 12, 2013, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Watanabe’s Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 72) is affirmed and adopted. It is further -1- Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, Municipality, City and County of Denver; Keri Johnson; David Ryan; AP Richmond; J. Casias; J. Andrews; J. Simmons; and Robert Hart, and against Plaintiff, Cecil Bynum, on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims, the amended complaint and this civil action are dismissed with prejudice. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 13th day of March, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.