Ross v. Colorado Department of Transportation, No. 1:2011cv02603 - Document 67 (D. Colo. 2013)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Colorado Department of Transportation against David C. Ross. Defendant's Memorandum Brief in Support of Combined Motion To Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is GRANTED IN PART; The motion to dismis s is GRANTED; Plaintiff's claims arising under the First Amendment (Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief) and under state law (Sixth Claim for Relief) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on behalf of defendant, the Colorado Department of Transportation, against plaintiff, David C. Ross, on plaintiff's claims arising under the First Amendment (Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief) and under state law (Sixth Claim for Relief); JUDGMENT IS ALSO ENTERED on behalf of defendant, the Colorado Department of Transportation, against plaintiff, David C. Ross, as to plaintiff's claims arising under Title VII for hostile work environment, failure to accommodate, discrimination, and retaliation (the First, Second, and Seventh Claims for Relief); and defendant is AWARDED its costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court. By Clerk on 3/18/13. (kfinn, )

Download PDF
Ross v. Colorado Department of Transportation Doc. 67 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02603-REB-KMT DAVID C. ROSS, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the orders entered in this case, Final Judgment is entered. A. Pursuant to the Order [#55] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on November 14, 2012, which order is incorporated by reference, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendant’s Memorandum Brief in Support of Combined Motion To Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment [#19], filed June 29, 2012, is GRANTED IN PART; 2. That the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and 3. That plaintiff’s claims arising under Title VII for hostile work environment, failure to accommodate, discrimination, and retaliation (the First, Second, and Seventh Claims for Relief) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. B. Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss [#66] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on March 14, 2013, which order is incorporated by Dockets.Justia.com reference, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendant's Memorandum Brief in Support of Combined Motion To Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment [#19], filed June 29, 2012, is GRANTED IN PART; 2. That the motion to dismiss is GRANTED; 3. That plaintiff’s claims arising under the First Amendment (Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief) and under state law (Sixth Claim for Relief) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on behalf of defendant, the Colorado Department of Transportation, against plaintiff, David C. Ross, on plaintiff’s claims arising under the First Amendment (Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief) and under state law (Sixth Claim for Relief); 5. That JUDGMENT IS ALSO ENTERED on behalf of defendant, the Colorado Department of Transportation, against plaintiff, David C. Ross, as to plaintiff’s claims arising under Title VII for hostile work environment, failure to accommodate, discrimination, and retaliation (the First, Second, and Seventh Claims for Relief); and 6. That defendant is AWARDED its costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 18th day of March, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.