Wilson v. Jones et al
Filing
88
ORDER. Applicants Motion in Objection... 86 is DENIED. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/1/2013. (cmacd)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01795-PAB
DOUGLAS WILSON,
Applicant,
v.
SUSAN JONES, CSP Warden, and
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado,
Respondents.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the “Motion in Objection . . .” [Docket No. 86]
filed pro se by Applicant Douglas Wilson. Mr. Wilson objects to the Court’s Order
[Docket No. 85] entered on February 5, 2013, denying Mr. Wilson’s motion to lift the
stay entered in this action. Mr. Wilson also requests an order directing prison officials
to return his legal property and assistance in filing a separate civil action regarding the
loss of his legal property.
On August 31, 2012, the Court entered an order granting Mr. Wilson’s motion for
a stay of these proceedings [Docket No. 58] and ordered that the action is stayed until
the pending state court postconviction proceedings are concluded. The Court also
directed Mr. Wilson to file monthly status reports during the stay describing the status of
the state court proceedings.
To the extent Mr. Wilson objects to the Court’s order denying his motion to lift the
stay, the Court construes the “Motion in Objection . . .” liberally as a motion to
reconsider and denies the motion because there is no indication that the state court
proceedings have concluded. Mr. Wilson’s request for an order to return his legal
property will be denied because this action is stayed. The request for assistance in
filing a separate civil action will be denied because any issues regarding a separate civil
action may not be raised in this action. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Applicant’s “Motion in Objection . . .” [Docket No. 86] is DENIED.
DATED March 1, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
