Osei v. Brooks et al, No. 1:2011cv01135 - Document 139 (D. Colo. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of City and County of Denver, The, David Nguyen, James Brooks, T. Tobin and against George Francis Osei pursuant to 138 Order. Defendants are awarded their costs. By Clerk on 3/22/13. (dkals, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Osei v. Brooks et al Doc. 139 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-01135-PAB-KMT GEORGE FRANCIS OSEI, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BROOKS, DAVID NGUYEN, and T. TOBIN, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 138] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on March 19, 2013, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief Relating to the Toilet Water Incident [Docket No. 66] is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Third and Fourth Claims for Relief [Docket No. 67] is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff and the case is closed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 22nd day of March, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
