Walker v. Astrue
Filing
10
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases ( ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 12/21/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 1/20/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 2/4/2010. By Judge John L. Kane on 11/16/2009. (sah, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01878-AP CHADWICK R. WALKER
Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: PATRICK C.H. SPENCER, II Spencer & Spencer, P.C. 830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320 Colorado Springs, CO 80906 719-632-4808 patrick@2spencers.com For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-0017 tom.kraus@ssa.gov
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: August 7, 2009 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 14, 2009 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: October 19, 2009
4.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate. To the best of his knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS The parties state that there are no other matters.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: December 21, 2009 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: January 20, 2010 C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: February 4, 2010
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument
-2-
10.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11.
OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 16th day of November, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane ______________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
3
APPROVED: For Plaintiff: s/ Patrick C.H. Spencer, II PATRICK C.H. SPENCER, II Spencer & Spencer, P.C. 830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320 Colorado Springs, CO 80906 719-632-4808 patrick@2spencers.com For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE Acting United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov s/ Thomas H. Kraus THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-0017 tom.kraus@ssa.gov
4
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
