Shelton v. Courtyard Management Corporation et al
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 18 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/18/09.(erv, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01761-WYD-MEH WILLIAM SHELTON, Plaintiff, v. COURTYARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and COLORADO SNOW SERVICES, LLC, a Division of ENRIGHT COMPANIES, LLC, both Colorado corporations, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 18, 2009. Plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint [filed November 16, 2009; docket #18] is denied without prejudice with leave to re-file. Although Plaintiff's counsel certifies "he has conferred or made reasonable attempts to confer" with opposing counsel, Plaintiff's counsel makes no indication whether the request is opposed, nor does Plaintiff's counsel describe the specific efforts made to comply with this rule. The Court reminds the parties of their continuing obligations to comply fully with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A and B. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
