Parker v. Ritter et al

Filing 294

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix: Motion Hearing held on 11/24/2009. It is ORDERED: Plaintiff will re-send 18 Requests for Production of Documents directly to Mr. Quinn, attorney for Defendants. Defendants wi ll respond within 30 days from the date of receipt of Plaintiffs Requests. Any Motion to Compel regarding alleged insufficiency of Defendants responses to Plaintiffs document requests shall be filed after receipt of Defendants Responses. Plaintiffs M otion for Extension of Time [sic] Discovery Date 284 is GRANTED. Discovery Deadline is extended to 1/15/2010. Dispositive Motions Deadline is extended to 2/16/2010. Plaintiffs Motion for Order to Correct Error Made by the Defendants Concerning Disc overy 292 is DENIED without prejudice. Defendants oral Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion for Order 292 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to DELETE pages 3 - 8 of [Docket No. 292] from the Courts Electronic Case Filing, as they contain confidential information which is unrelated to this case. (Court Reporter FTR - Kathleen Finney) (klmcd) Modified on 11/25/2009 to add type of hearing and date to text (wjc, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom C-204 Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse Date: November 24, 2009 Courtroom Deputy, Kathleen Finney ______________________________________________________________________________ KEITH PARKER, Plaintiff(s), v. BILL RITTER, ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, MARK BROADUS, PAUL HOLLENBECK, WARDEN ARELLANO, CAPTAIN HALL, LEONARD VIGIL, DAVID M. ZUPAN, MR. ENREQUIZ, LT. PIPER, MRS. SUSAN JONES, MRS. JILL HOGGARTH, DR. MICHAUD, LT. ROBERT STEINBECK, MRS. DONNA WEBSTER, and LT. M. MCCORMICK, James X. Quinn Pro Se Civil Action No.: 08-cv-00737-MSK-KLM Defendant(s). ______________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ HEARING: MOTIONS HEARING Court in Session: 11:00 a.m. Court calls case. Pro Se appearance of Plaintiff; appearance of counsel. Motion Hearing is scheduled regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time [sic] Discovery Date [Docket No. 284, filed 11/13/2009], and Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Correct Error Made by the Defendants Concerning Discovery [Docket No. 292, filed 11/20/2009]. Plaintiff's argument by Pro Se Plaintiff, Keith Parker. Defendants' argument by James X. Quinn. It is ORDERED: It is ORDERED: It is ORDERED: Plaintiff will re-send 18 Requests for Production of Documents directly to Mr. Quinn, attorney for Defendants. Defendants will respond within 30 days from the date of receipt of Plaintiff's Requests. Any Motion to Compel regarding alleged insufficiency of Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's document requests shall be filed after receipt of Defendants' Responses. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time [sic] Discovery Date [Docket No. 284] is GRANTED. Discovery Deadline is extended to JANUARY 15, 2010. Dispositive Motions Deadline is extended to FEBRUARY 16, 2010. Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Correct Error Made by the Defendants Concerning Discovery [Docket No. 292] is DENIED without prejudice. Defendant's oral Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Order [Docket No. 292] is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to DELETE pages 3 - 8 of Docket No. 292 from the Court's Electronic Case Filing, as they contain confidential information which is unrelated to this case. HEARING CONCLUDES. Court in recess: 11:30 a.m. Total In-Court Time: 00:30 To order a transcript of this proceeding, contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119. It is ORDERED: It is ORDERED: It is ORDERED: It is ORDERED: Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?