Van Eaton v. Lee Hecht Harrison, LLC. Employee Welfare Plan, No. 1:2007cv02459 - Document 77 (D. Colo. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER For Entry of Final Judgment. Upon consideration of 72 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Money Judgment and for Order Concerning Future Benefits, clerk is directed to enter judgment as follows: Plaintiff to have and recover $172,699.7 1 in benefits due and payable through 5/31/09, with post judgment interest at the statutory rate, to accrue on that amount from the date of judgment forward. Defendants MetLife and the Plan to continue to pay to Plaintiff a monthly long term disability benefit in the amount of $5,997.82 for so long as Plaintiff remains disabled and eligible for such benefits under the terms of the Plan, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/2/09.(gmssl, )

Download PDF
Van Eaton v. Lee Hecht Harrison, LLC. Employee Welfare Plan Doc. 77 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 07-cv-02459-RPM CONSTANCE VAN EATON, Plaintiff, v. LEE HECHT HARRISON, LLC EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN, ADECCO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a METLIFE, Defendants. ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Money Judgment and for an Order Concerning Future Benefits [72], filed on May 6, 2009, and the Response of MetLife and the Plan [76], filed on May 29, 2009, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to enter judgment as follows: 1. That plaintiff shall have and recover the sum of $172,699.71 in benefits due and payable through May 31, 2009, with post judgment interest at the statutory rate, to accrue on that amount from the date of judgment forward. 2. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Defendants MetLife and the Plan shall continue to pay to Plaintiff Constance Van Eaton a monthly long term disability benefit in the amount of $5,997.82 for so long as Plaintiff Constance Van Eaton remains disabled and eligible for such benefits under the terms of the Plan.” Dockets.Justia.com DATED: July 2nd, 2009 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.