Trujillo et al v. Colorado Springs, City of et al
Filing
112
ORDER APPROVING SECOND APPLICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL COSTS INCURRED AFTER ENTRY OF JUDGMENT: The 111 Motion for Costs is GRANTED. Supplemental costs from December 5, 2008, to October 12, 2009, plus estimated expenses of Class Administration through January 16, 2010, in the amount of $8,636.34 are approved and awarded to class counsel, and shall be paid by Defendant according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/2/09.(msksec, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 07-cv-00753-MSK-BNB ALEXANDER L. TRUJILLO, DAVID HENRICHSEN, GILBERT LUCERO, ALAN ROMAN, COLBY DOOLITTLE, OTTO KNOLLHOFF, and MATT MARTIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, Defendant. ORDER APPROVING SECOND APPLICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL COSTS INCURRED AFTER ENTRY OF JUDGMENT THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Second Unopposed Motion for Approval of Supplemental Costs Incurred after Entry of Judgment (#111) filed October 30, 2009. Having reviewed the Motion, the Court FINDS that the Final Order Approving Settlement, Awarding Fees and Closing Case (Docket No. 107) provided in paragraph 3 that class counsel may file supplemental applications for costs. The costs requested in the instant Motion are reasonable. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Supplemental costs from December 5, 2008, to October 12, 2009, plus estimated expenses of Class Administration through January 16, 2010, in the amount of $8,636.34 are approved and awarded to class counsel, and shall be paid by Defendant according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
DATED this 2nd day of November, 2009. BY THE COURT:
Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
