Garcia v. Berkshire Life Ins, et al

Filing 411

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Lewis T. Babcock: Motions Hearing. ORDERED:Plaintiffs Motion to Vacate Order and for Continuance 409 is GRANTED. ORDERED:A further scheduling hearing is set Tuesday, December 29, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. i n Courtroom C401, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall file a joint proposed scheduling order prior to the hearing. (Court Reporter Gwen Daniel.) (ltbcd, ) Modified on 11/10/2009 to add text for type of hearing (wjc, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK _____________________________________________________________________ Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Hansen Date: November 9, 2009 Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel _____________________________________________________________________ Civil Case No. 04-cv-01619-LTB-BNB TINA GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES _____________________________________________________________________ HEARING - Motion to Vacate and Continue 09:48 a.m. Appearances Court's comments In affirming this Court's dismissal of the Complaint in this case, the Tenth Circuit remanded the case to determine whether three documents, produced after the Magistrate Judge's Sanction Order, were fabricated intentionally, which were made a part of the appellate record. Argument/Discussion ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order and for Continuance (Doc No. 409) is GRANTED. Court in Session Rachel Ann Yates Counsel: John Hertzog 1 ORDERED: A further scheduling hearing is set Tuesday, December 29, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall file a joint proposed scheduling order prior to the hearing. 10:10 a.m. Court in Recess Hearing concluded Time: /22 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?