Gonzalez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A et al
Filing
15
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/6/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
*E-FILED: August 6, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
No. C12-03842 HRL
ARCELIA G. GONZALEZ, an individual,
12
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED
TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
15
16
17
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as successor in
interest to WACHOVIA MORTGAGE FSB, a
business entity form unknown; LSI TITLE
COMPANY, a business entity form unknown;
NDEX WEST, LLC, a business entity form
unknown; and DOES 1 through 50,
Defendants.
/
18
19
Plaintiff has moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
20
Because plaintiff requests immediate injunctive relief, but not all parties have consented to
21
magistrate jurisdiction, the undersigned lacks jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s application.
22
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Clerk of the Court shall promptly reassign this case
23
to a district judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636.
24
Dated: August 6, 2012
25
HOWARD R. LLOYD
26
27
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:12-cv-03842-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Christopher John Bunch
3
Edward A. Treder
4
Grace B Kang gkang@afrct.com, afrctecf@afrct.com, emartinez@afrct.com,
mbetti@afrct.com
christopher.j.bunch@gmail.com
edwardt@bdftw.com, elizabgo@bdftw.com
5
Luis Walters Camacho
luis@camachoandassociates.com
6
7
Robert Arthur Bailey rbailey@afrct.com, AFRCTECF@afrct.com, hsaller@afrct.com,
mmantoen@afrct.com, rguillory@afrct.com
8
Shaneil B Sharma
shaneil.sharma2010@gmail.com
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
