Gleason v. World Savings Bank, FSB et al
Filing
13
ORDER Vacating Motion Hearing re 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9/11/2012 hearing is vacated. Matter deemed submitted on the papers without oral argument. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/31/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
*E-FILED: August 31, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
MARSHALL T. GLEASON III,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
No. C12-03598 HRL
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
v.
WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB; WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A;
WELLS FARGO ASSET SECURITIES
CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES 2007AR4 TRUST; HSBC BANK USA, N.A.;
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; AND
ALL PERSONS CLAIMING BY, THROUGH
OR UNDER SUCH PERSON, ALL PERSONS
UNKNOWN, CLAIMING ANY LEGAL OR
EQUITABLE TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN OR
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED
IN THE COMPLAINT ADVERSE TO
PLAINTIFFS TITLE THERETO; and DOES 1
to 20, Inclusive,
Defendants.
/
23
24
Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 4) is deemed suitable for determination on
25
the papers without oral argument, and the September 11, 2012 hearing is vacated. Civ. L.R. 7-
26
1(b). SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: August 31, 2012
28
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:12-cv-03598-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Jeremy E Shulman jshulman@afrct.com, afrctecf@afrct.com, cgoodwin@afrct.com,
coldham@afrct.com, dpandy@afrct.com, mbetti@afrct.com, npeters@afrct.com,
vngo@afrct.com
3
4
5
5:12-cv-03598-HRL Notice sent by U.S. Mail to:
6
Marshall T. Gleason III
P.O. Box 609
Ridgefield, WA 98642-0609
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
