Lackner v. Digital First Media, Inc
Filing
21
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 18 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss.(lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case5:12-cv-03243-LHK Document18 Filed08/29/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
THE MILLS LAW FIRM
Robert W. Mills, Esq. (Bar No. 062154)
Joshua D. Boxer, Esq. (Bar No. 226712)
Corey B. Bennett, Esq. (Bar No. 267816)
880 Las Gallinas Avenue, Suite 2
San Rafael, CA 94903
Tel: 415-455-1326; Fax: 415-455-1327
Robert@millslawfirm.com
Josh@millslawfirm.com
Corey@millslawfirm.com
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
Case No. CV 12-03243 LKH
ZELDA LACKNER
Plaintiff,
v.
DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
CLASS ACTION:
STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LACKNER v. DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Case5:12-cv-03243-LHK Document18 Filed08/29/12 Page2 of 3
1
2
3
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2012, Defendant Digital First Media, Inc. (“Defendant”), filed
a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Zelda Lackner’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6);
4
5
WHEREAS, due to previously scheduled travel in the coming weeks, Plaintiff’s counsel
requested additional time to respond to Defendant’s motion to dismiss;
6
WHEREAS, the instant motion to dismiss is not set for hearing until December 20, 2012;
7
8
WHEREAS, Defendant is amenable to granting Plaintiff an extension of time to file an
opposition to the motion to dismiss to Friday, October 5, 2012;
9
10
WHEREAS, Plaintiff is amenable to granting Defendant an extension of time to file a
reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss to Friday, November 2, 2012.
11
STIPULATION
12
13
14
NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed to between Defendant and Plaintiff that
Plaintiff shall have until and including Friday, October 5, 2012, to file an opposition to
Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
15
16
17
18
19
20
It is further stipulated and agreed to between Defendant and Plaintiff that Defendant shall
have until and including Friday, November 2, 2012, to file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to said
motion to dismiss.
///
///
///
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LACKNER v. DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
-1-
Case5:12-cv-03243-LHK Document18 Filed08/29/12 Page3 of 3
1
Dated: August 29, 2012
2
Respectfully submitted,
THE MILLS LAW FIRM
3
By:
4
5
6
7
Dated: August 29, 2012
/s/ Joshua D. Boxer
Robert W. Mills (SBN 062154)
Joshua D. Boxer (SBN 226712)
Corey B. Bennett (SBN 267816)
Attorneys for Plaintiff Zelda Lackner
COOLEY LLP
8
9
10
11
12
13
By:
/s/ Darcie A. Tilly
Michelle C. Doolin (179445)
Christopher B. Durbin (218611)
Darcie A. Tilly (239715)
Attorneys for Defendant
DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LACKNER v. DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
STIPULATION RE: TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
2
Case5:12-cv-03243-LHK Document18-1 Filed08/29/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
THE MILLS LAW FIRM
Robert W. Mills, Esq. (Bar No. 062154)
Joshua D. Boxer, Esq. (Bar No. 226712)
Corey B. Bennett, Esq. (Bar No. 267816)
880 Las Gallinas Avenue, Suite 2
San Rafael, CA 94903
Tel: 415-455-1326; Fax: 415-455-1327
Robert@millslawfirm.com
Josh@millslawfirm.com
Corey@millslawfirm.com
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
Case No. CV 12-03243 LKH
ZELDA LACKNER
Plaintiff,
v.
DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
CLASS ACTION:
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LACKNER v. DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
PROPOSED ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
Case5:12-cv-03243-LHK Document18-1 Filed08/29/12 Page2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed the Parties’ Stipulation re Briefing Schedule for Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff shall have until and including Friday, October 5, 2012, to file an opposition to
Defendant’s motion to dismiss; and
2. Defendant shall have until and including Friday, November 2, 2012, to file a reply to
Plaintiff’s opposition to said motion to dismiss.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 30
Dated: _________________, 2012
12
13
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LACKNER v. DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA, INC.
PROPOSED ORDER RE: STIPULATION RE: TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
-1-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
