In re LinkedIn User Privacy Litigation
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/15/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2012) Modified on 8/15/2012 (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ER
R NIA
J. Davila
FO
d w a rd
J u d ge E
H
8
SEAN P. REIS (184044)
(sreis@edelson.com)
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Telephone: (949) 459-2124
RT
7
NO
Attorneys for Defendant LINKEDIN CORPORATION
6
LI
5
A
4
RT
U
O
3
S
2
COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com)
S DISTRICT
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) (brownmd@cooley.com)
TE
C
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (216083) (wsomvichian@cooley.com)TA
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
TED
GRAN
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
JAY EDELSON* (jedelson@edelson.com)
RAFEY S. BALABANIAN* (rbalabanian@edelson.com)
ARI J. SCHARG* (ascharg@edelson.com)
CHRISTOPHER L. DORE* (cdore@edelson.com)
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone: (312) 589-6370
Fax: (312) 589-6378
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATIE SZPYRKA
16
*Admitted pro hac vice
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case No. 12-CV-3088 EJD
KATIE SZPYRKA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(CIV. L.R. 6-1(a))
Plaintiff,
v.
LINKEDIN CORPORATION, a Delaware
Corporation,
Courtroom:
Judge:
Trial Date:
Defendant.
4, 5th Floor
Hon. Edward J. Davila
None Set
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1.
1
This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiff Katie Szpyrka (“Plaintiff”) and
2
defendant LinkedIn Corporation (“LinkedIn”) (Plaintiff and LinkedIn collectively the “Parties”),
3
by and through their respective counsel.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California on June 15, 2012;
WHEREAS a Waiver of the Service of Summons form, executed by LinkedIn’s counsel,
has been filed;
WHEREAS the current deadline for LinkedIn to answer, move, or otherwise respond to
the Complaint is August 14, 2012 (60 days from the date on which Plaintiffs sent the request for
waiver of service to LinkedIn);
WHEREAS, by Clerks’ Notice, the initial Case Management Conference in this action is
currently set for August 24, 2012;
13
WHEREAS the Parties, in a separate filing, have jointly requested that the Court
14
reschedule the initial Case Management Conference from August 24, 2012 to August 31, 2012;
15
WHEREAS under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without a
16
court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to a complaint;
17
WHEREAS extending the date for LinkedIn to respond to the Complaint as set forth
18
below will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;
19
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
20
LinkedIn’s deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this
21
action—currently August 14, 2012—is extended to 45 days after the date of the forthcoming
22
initial Case Management Conference.
23
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
2.
1
Dated: August 13, 2012
2
COOLEY LLP
3
By: /s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown (196972)
4
Attorneys for Defendant LINKEDIN CORP.
5
6
7
8
9
Dated: August 13, 2012
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
By: /s/ Ari J. Scharg
Ari J. Scharg
Attorneys for Plaintiff KATIE SZPYRKA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
3.
1
2
3
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Matthew D. Brown, attest that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
4
5
Dated: August 13, 2012
6
/s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown
7
8
1052048/HN
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
4.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
