Burrell et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 21 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case5:11-cv-04569-LHK Document21 Filed07/27/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LORI E. PEGG, Acting County Counsel (S.B. #129073)
KARL A. SANDOVAL, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #170190)
MELISSA R. KINIYALOCTS, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #215814)
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor
San Jose, California 95110-1770
Telephone: (408) 299-5900
Facsimile: (408) 292-7240
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, DAN
PEDDYCORD, RAE WEDEL, and MARTY
FENSTERSHEIB
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(San Jose)
9
10
11
12
ALMA BURRELL, VICKYE HAYTER,
MARGARET HEADD,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
No.
CV11-04569 LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO
COMPLETE EARLY NEUTRAL
EVALUATION
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, DAN
PEDDYCORD, RAE WEDEL, MARTY
16 FENSTERSHEIB AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50
INCLUSIVE,
15
17
Defendants.
18
19
The parties in the above-captioned case and the appointed evaluator submit this stipulation to
20
continue the deadline to complete the Early Neutral Evaluation. The requested extension is based on
21
the following grounds.
22
On May 9, 2012, the Court held an initial case management conference, after which the case
23
was referred to an Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE). On May 16, 2012, the court appointed an
24
evaluator, Thomas Gosselin. Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 5-4(b), the deadline to complete the ENE
25
is currently August 7, 2012.
26
On June 5, 2012, the parties and the appointed evaluator agreed to an ENE session on July
27
17, 2012. On July 16, 2012, however, Plaintiffs’ counsel indicated that the ENE would have to be
28
rescheduled because they were in a trial that began on that date in the Superior Court of the State of
1
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to
Continue Deadline to Complete ENE
CV11-04569 LHK
Case5:11-cv-04569-LHK Document21 Filed07/27/12 Page2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
California for the County of Sacramento.
The appointed evaluator has indicated that he has scheduling conflicts between now and
August 7, 2012, and requested the parties to prepare a stipulation to extend the ENE deadline.
Accordingly, the parties stipulate to continue the deadline to complete the ENE to September
28, 2012.
6
7
8
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
“conformed” signature (/S/) within this efiled document.
LORI E. PEGG
ACTING COUNTY COUNSEL
9
10
11
Dated: July 27, 2012
By:
12
/S/
MELISSA R. KINIYALOCTS
Deputy County Counsel
.
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, DAN
PEDDYCORD, RAE WEDEL, and MARTY
FENSTERSHEIB
13
14
15
LAW OFFICES OF BONNER & BONNER
16
17
18
Dated: July 26, 2012
By:
19
/S/
CABRAL BONNER, ESQ.
.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ALMA BURRELL, VICKYE HAYTER, and
MARGARET HEADD
20
21
22
TERAOKA & PARTNERS LLP
23
24
Dated: July 24, 2012
25
By:
/S/
THOMAS M. GOSSELIN, ESQ.
Evaluator
.
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to
Continue Deadline to Complete ENE
2
CV11-04569 LHK
Case5:11-cv-04569-LHK Document21 Filed07/27/12 Page3 of 3
PROPOSED ORDER
1
The deadline to complete the ENE in this case is continued to September 28, 2012.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
August 1, 2012
Dated:____________________
_____________________________
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
613166.DOC
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to
Continue Deadline to Complete ENE
3
CV11-04569 LHK
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
