Ortiz v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Filing
18
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment and/or Remand, 16 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time, 15 CROSS-MOTION for Summary Judgment. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2012)
<![CDATA[
Case5:11-cv-04285-LHK Document16 Filed08/16/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
JAMES HUNT MILLER (St.BarCal.# 135160)
P.O. Box 10891
OAKLAND CA 94610
P:(510) 451-2132
F:(510) 451-0824
e:jim_miller0@yahoo.com
4
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
Catherine Aurora Ortiz,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
vs.
Commissioner of the
Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
____________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION
(with proposed order)
17
18
MOTION.
19
Plaintiff hereby requests additional time in which to file Plaintiff’s Reply.
20
Pursuant to the time allowed in the Procedural Order (14 days from service of
21
opposition) and F.R.Civ.P. Rules 6(e) and 5(e) (3 days), and filing\service of the
22
opposition on July 16, Plaintiff’s reply was to have been filed by August 2. Plaintiff
23
seeks a 14-day extension, or until August 16, 2012. Such extension would not affect
24
Defendant, but would make submission for decision, upon filing of Plaintiff’s reply,
25
14 days later.
26
Defendant, through counsel Patrick Snyder, stated (by e-mail) to Plaintiff’s
27
counsel that Defendant does not oppose this request. Plaintiff submits and requests
28
that no hearing is necessary in this motion, as is usual in Social Security litigation (per
Plf’s Req xtn – Ortiz v. SSA – NDCA 5:11-cv-4285 LHK
1
Case5:11-cv-04285-LHK Document16 Filed08/16/12 Page2 of 2
1
the Procedural Order), and also because Defendant would not be harmed by the
2
extension and Defendant does not oppose the request.
3
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this 16th day of August, 2012.
4
/s/_________________________________________
James Hunt Miller, Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
ORDER (PROPOSED)
8
PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION, IT IS ORDERED
9
that Plaintiff may have a 14-day extension, or through August 16, 2012, in which to file
10
a reply.
11
12
13
14
August 17, 2012
DATE: ___________________
__________________________________
UnitedH. KOHDistrict Judge
LUCY States
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plf’s Req xtn – Ortiz v. SSA – NDCA 5:11-cv-4285 LHK
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
