Atterbury v. Daly
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/22/12. (Attachments: # 1 cert of service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DANNY F. ATTERBURY,
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13
DENISE DALY,
14
Defendant.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 11-2387 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docket No. 24.)
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil rights action under 42
17
U.S.C. § 1983. On January 20, 2012, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. On
18
February 22, 2012, Plaintiff filed an opposition. On July 16, 2012, the Court notified Plaintiff
19
that he would be allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of the order to file a supplemental
20
opposition in light of Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935, 940-41 (9th Cir. 2012). Plaintiff has
21
filed a motion for an extension of time to file his supplemental opposition. Plaintiff’s motion is
22
GRANTED. The supplemental opposition shall be filed no later than fourteen days after the
23
filing date of this order. Defendant’s supplemental reply shall be filed no later than seven days
24
thereafter.
25
This order terminates docket no. 24.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
DATED:
8/22/12
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Ext. of Time to File Supp. Opp. To Def. Motion for Summary Judgment
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Atterbury387eot_suppOpp.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?