Saatnia v. Walgreen Company
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING 35 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Fact Discovery cutoff 10/1/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/21/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
REX DARRELL BERRY, State Bar No. 110219
BRIAN CRONE, State Bar No. 191731
BERRY & BLOCK LLP
2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 415
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 564-2000
(916) 564-2024 FAX
5
6
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
WALGREEN CO.
Mohammad Saatnia (Pro Se)
5310 Sigrid Way
San Jose, CA 95123
(408) 230-0306
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
14
MOHAMMED SAATNIA,
Plaintiff,
15
16
v.
17
WALGREEN COMPANY., a Foreign
Corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
) Case No. 5:11-CV-02003 EJD
)
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
XXXXXXX
) FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
)
)
)
)
)
)
IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline to complete fact discovery is extended 45 days to
October 1, 2012.
22
23
8/21/2012
Dated: ______________________
___________________________________
Honorable Edward J. Davila
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MOHAMMAD SAATNIA,
Case Number: CV11-02003 EJD
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
WALGREEN COMPANY et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on August 21, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Mohammad Saatnia
5310 Sigrid Way
San Jose, CA 95123
Dated: August 21, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?