Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1897
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh denying 1865 Apple's Motion Regarding Closing Argument.(lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
)
a Korean corporation;
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
a New York corporation;
)
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
)
AMERICA, LLC,
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE APPLE’S MOTION
REGARDING CLOSING ARGUMENT
18
Apple filed a motion requesting that the Court “instruct Samsung in advance of closing
19
arguments that it may not argue based on excluded evidence” in violation of pre-trial or trial
20
rulings. After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Court DENIES, without prejudice, Apple’s
21
motion. The Court presumes that as officers of the court, the attorneys will comply with all pre22
trial and trial rulings in this case. If Samsung raises an argument based on evidence or theories
23
previously struck by the Court, Apple may timely object to Samsung’s closing argument.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: August 21, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER ON APPLE’S MOTION REGARDING CLOSING ARGUMENT
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
