Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1889
Reformatted Final Exhibit List. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/21/12. (lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
)
a Korean corporation;
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
a New York corporation;
)
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
)
AMERICA, LLC,
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
)
a Korean corporation;
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
a New York corporation;
)
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
)
AMERICA, LLC,
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Counterclaim-Defendant.
)
)
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
REFORMATTED FINAL EXHIBIT LIST
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
REFORMATTED FINAL EXHIBIT LIST
1
Attached as Exhibit A is a reformatted final exhibit list. The content of the exhibit list has
2
not changed.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: August 21, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
REFORMATTED FINAL EXHIBIT LIST
1
EXHIBIT A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
REFORMATTED FINAL EXHIBIT LIST
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
PX
PX
PX
EXHIBIT
NO.
3
4
5
PX
6
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
21A
23
PX
24
PX
PX
25A.1
28
PX
PX
30
31
PX
PX
33
34
PX
35
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
Court's Limiting Instruction
Apple and Samsung Smartphones
Apple and Samsung Tablets
Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
Tablet Designs
Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
Phone Designs
Photographs of accused Samsung devices
Photographs of Apple products
Design alternatives considered by Peter Bressler
iPhone and iPad Advertisements
iPhone Television Advertisements
iPad Television Advertisements
iPhone & iPad Media Clips
Apple’s Sales of iPhone and iPad
iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures
Summary of iPhone and iPad News Coverage
Screen captures considered by S. Kare
Summary of Hal Poret's Secondary Meanings Surveys
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/7/2012
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
8/7/2012
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
Summary of Kent Van Liere's Association/Confusion
Surveys: photos and placeholder for videos
Summary of Apple's damages calculations
Summary of Samsung’s fixed, variable, and nonproduct costs
Summary of survey conducted by J. Hauser
Selection of Samsung source code from Bates range
SAMNDCA-C000000001 - SAMNDCA-C000009221
8/10/2012
iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures
Translation of Presentation: Feasibility Review on
Standalone AP Business for Smart Phone Market
Email from J. Boltello re: Additional wallpapers for
Genie
8/3/2012
8/13/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/7/2012
8/7/2012
8/13/2012
8/13/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/16/2012
1 of 12
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
Do not consider as evidence that Apple trade dress was
famous. You may consider for some other purpose; for
example, whether or not Apple's designs acquired secondary
meaning.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
PX
EXHIBIT
NO.
36
PX
38
PX
40
PX
42
PX
43
PX
44
PX
46
PX
52
PX
54
PX
PX
PX
55
56
57
PX
58
PX
59
PX
60
PX
62
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
Presentation: Touch Portfolio Rollout Strategy
Recommendation Based on Consumer Insight
Presentation: Browser Zooming Methods UX
Exploration Study
Translation of Email from Bong-Hee Kim regarding
Summary of Executive-Level Meeting Supervised by
Head of Division (February 10)
Translation of Email from Hyun Kim regarding PI/P3
Division Head Design Report Meeting Minutes, dated
February 16, 2010
Translation of Email from Ki Hyun Seo regarding Team
Leader's Directives at the Executives' Meeting 2/22
(Mon)
Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhone, March 2,
2010 Product Engineering Team SW Verification
Group
Translation of selected pages from Presentation:
Behold3 Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group
Presentation: Samsung's Use of Apple Patents in
Smartphones
Presentation: Lessons from Apple
Boston Consulting Group
Presentation: Samsung mobile icon design for 2011
Presentation: Samsung Q4 '10 Deep Dive
Translation of selected pages from Presentation: P5
Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group 1
Email from Justin Denison regarding GS Choi's
Direction and Request to STA
Translation of Presentation: North America P4(P7510
WiFi) BBY Retail Store Visit T/F Report
Presentation: STA Competitive Situation Paradigm
Shift
Presentation: iPhone 5 Counter Strategy
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/7/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/14/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
2 of 12
Do not consider as evidence that Samsung's conduct was
willful; however, you may consider it for some other purpose.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
PX
EXHIBIT
NO.
69
PX
70
PX
72
PX
74
PX
PX
78
80
Intel Invoices to Apple (12/22/11-12/29/11)
8/16/2012
Letter from SW Kim to B. Teksler, dated July 25, 2011 8/16/2012
PX
81
PX
PX
84
89
PX
PX
PX
91
97
100
PX
101
Patent Cross License Agreement between Intel and
Samsung with Amendments 1 & 2
3GPP Website Screenshots
Presentation: Samsung Q1 '11 Deep Dive Continuous
Tracking (5/16/08 - 04/03/11) [Exhibit 1603 to Benner
Desposition]
U.S. Patent No. 6,928,648 Wong
U.S. Patent No. 6,819,658 - Agarwal
Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-190774 and
English translation
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #47 Tdoc R2-051680,
Athens, Greece, May 9-13, 2005, Change Request
PX
104
PX
PX
112
113.4,
113.5
2011 Wireless Smartphone Satisfatction Sture
Management Report, March 2011 [Exhibit 1594 to
Benner Deposition]
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #42, R1-050995
London, UK, 29 August – 2 September, 2005,
Approved Report of 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #41 in
Athens (Athens, Greece, 09 – 13 May, 2005)
TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #48, R2-052063, London, 29
August - 02 Sep 2005, Approved minutes of the 47
TSG-RAN WG2 meeting (Athens Greece, 09-13 May
2005)
Addendum 1 ETSI/GA 29(97)/SCM/3, Amendments to
the ETSI Interim Intellectual Property Rights Policy
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/13/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
Email from Juho Lee to 3GPP, dated June 18, 2004,
8/17/2012
attaching R1-040697, R1-040689, R-1040690, and R1040696
KR 10-2004-0013792 and English translation
8/16/2012
Sony Ericsson Affidavit of Lee Hill with Attachment
8/16/2012
3 of 12
You may only consider as evidence of knowledge, willfulness, or
intent. Do not consider for any other purpose.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
PX
EXHIBIT
NO.
116
PX
117
PX
PX
PX
PX
118
119
120
121
PX
PX
122
125
PX
PX
PX
127
128
133
PX
134
PX
135
PX
138
PX
140
PX
141
PX
142
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
143
143.04
143.06
143.12
143.16
143.22
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
Court's Limiting Instruction
Sony Ericsson Mobile Comm. AB, “Sony K700 User
Guide” (1st Ed.) March 2004
Sony Press Releases, dated March 9, 2004 and March
21, 2004
U.S. Patent No. 6,009,336 - Harris
U.S. Patent No. 6,069,648 - Suso
U.S. Patent No. 6,690,417 - Yoshida
Source Code Files, Camera and Photos Functionality
(See Appendix 1 for Bates Numbers)
Samsung ETSI IPR Statements
Sony Ericsson K700i mobile phone [Physical Device]
8/16/2012
How To TV ad for original iPhone
iPad Is Iconic TV ad for first-generation iPad
“Apple Waves Its Wand at the iPhone,” by David
Pogue, New York Times, January 11, 2007
“Testing Out the iPhone,” by Walter S. Mossberg and
Katherine Boehert, The Wall Street Journal, June 27,
2007
“Best Inventions of 2007,” by Lev Grossman, Time,
November 1, 2007 (including photo of cover)
“Apple Takes Big Gamble on New iPad,” by Yukari
Iwatani Kane, The Wall Street Journal, January 25,
2010
“Verdict Is in on Apple iPad: It’s a Winner,” by Edward
Baig, USA Today, April 2, 2010
“Laptop Killer? Pretty Close,” by Walter S. Mossberg,
The Wall Street Journal, April 1, 2010
“Patent Office Highlights Jobs’s Innovations,” New
York Times
Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/17/2012
8/16/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
4 of 12
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
EXHIBIT
NO.
143.25
143.82
144
145
146
148
150
155
158A
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
170
171
173
PX
174
PX
PX
180
186
PX
193
PX
PX
PX
DX
194
195
210
511
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q1
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q2
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q3
Nokia Lumia 800 [Physical Device]
Casio G’zOne Commando
Sony Tablet S [Physical Device]
User Interface Alternative Designs - Blackberry Torch
9850
iPhone CAD
Sketch of Phone
Phone CAD
Phone model 1017
Phone model 1015
Phone model 956
Phone model 961
Tablet model 1202
Tablet model 874
“Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Wi-Fi: A Worthy Rival to
the iPad 2,” by Melissa J. Perenson; PCWorld, June 8,
2011
“First Look: Samsung Vibrant Rips Off iPhone 3G
Design,” by Priya Ganapati, Wired, July 15, 2010
Samsung’s Financial Spreadsheet
Translation of email from H. T. Han regarding
"Domestig Galaxy Tab Main Horzontal Deployment
Items." dated 2010-20-27 [typo: 2010-10-27]
Juho Lee's August 12, 2004 e-mail and attachment
Samsung Proposal R1-040859 at TSG RAN WG1 #38
(Aug. 12, 2004)
Email from Sungsik Lee dated March 2, 2010
Email from Sangwook Han dated October 28, 2010
Photos of the Diamondtouch System
Japanese design patent JP D1241638 (“JP638”)
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/6/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/6/2012
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/17/2012
8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/14/2012
8/6/2012
5 of 12
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
DX
EXHIBIT
NO.
518
DX
526
DX
DX
528
529
DX
DX
DX
533
539
546
DX
548
DX
DX
549
550
DX
DX
556
557
DX
DX
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
Video of LaunchTile running on an HP iPAQ device
that was shown by Bederson at the CHI Conference
and HP iPAQ device running LaunchTile
Samsung F700 [Physical Device]
8/13/2012
XNav sourcecode
Fidler, Roger. "The Tablet Newspaper Vision 1981 2010." [Ex. 266 to Fidler Dep. Tr.]
iPhone User Guide for iOS 4.2 and 4.3 Software
iPhone User Guide for iOS 5.1 Software
Bederson et al.: Pad++ A Zooming Graphical Interface
for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics
Listing of MERL DiamondTouch Mandelbrot source
code files, dated December 8, 2003 through November
30, 2004, found on the MERL-Drive in the folders:
MERLDrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/co
m/merl/diamondtouch and MERLrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/com/
merl/forlines/fractal and MERL DiamondTouch Table
with Mandelbrot files
Samsung's December 14, 1998 Declaration to ETSI
Nomura Yasuhiro patent Japanese application and
translation
2006 Jeffrey Han demonstration video
3GPP standard TS 25.322 version 6.4.0 (Release 6)]
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
561
U.S. Patent Appl. No. 60/718187 (Flynt Provisional
Application for Enhanced Portable Device Navigation
Tools); U.S. Patent No. 7,933,632 ("Flynt Patent")
8/15/2012
562
March 8, 2006 email from Howarth to Ive
8/14/2012
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/6/2012
Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or non-infringement.
However, you may consider as evidence of alternative designs
and functionality.
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/20/2012
8/15/2012
6 of 12
Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or non-infringement.
However, you may consider as evidence of functionality.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
DX
EXHIBIT
NO.
572
DX
578
DX
586
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
592
613
621A
630
631
635A
635B
636
645
647
648
655
DX
661
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
April 14, 2010 Apple internal email chain and meeting
agenda; subject line: "iPhone 'firsts'"
Samsung-Apple Licensing Discussion, October 5,
2010
8/13/2012
ComTech United States Report Q410
ETSI Guide on IPRs, September 1-2, 2004
Reuter Tablet Video
Teece Expert Report of 3/22/2012 - Exs. 3A, 3B
Teece Expert Report of 4/2/2012 - Exs R4A-R4E
Intel Source Code for X-GOLD Processors
RLC Detail Design Spec
Infineon X-GOLD 61x Product Specification
Apple iOS Source Code
iPhone App testing including mail and photos
iPad App testing including mail and photos
Files related to DiamondTouch, DTFlash, and
Tablecloth including but not limited to: TableCloth
source code:
F:\diamondtouch\people\alan\dev\Flash\classes-200506-09\tablecloth_27.fla; Screenshot of Diamond
Touch-Flash Demonstration:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\DTFlash-2005-0607\index.htm TableCloth screenshot:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\Dtflash-2005-06-07 (Trac
decl. Ex. 25) and MERL DiamondTouch Table with
Tablecloth files
MERL DiamondTouch Price List and Terms and
Conditions of Sale dated 10/25/05 [Exhibit 2 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
8/3/2012
8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/15/2012
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/13/2012
7 of 12
Do not consider this evidence to prove or disprove the validity or
invalidity of a claim or the amount of a disputed claim.
However, you may consider this as evidence of whether or not
Samsung lacked notice of Apple's infringement claims.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
DX
EXHIBIT
NO.
662
DX
DX
DX
676
684.001
685
DX
687
DX
DX
693
695
DX
696
DX
697
DX
698
DX
712
DX
713
DX
DX
717
727
DX
728
DX
740
DX
741
DX
753
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
12/12/2005 MERL DiamondTouch table and
developers Kit Purchase Order [Exhibit 11 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
Financial Spreadsheet
Photographic Summary of Samsung Devices
TSG-RAN WG1 #38, Prague, Czechs, 16th - 20th
August 2004, Power control at the maximum power
limit for E-DCH
January 20, 2011 Apple Email regarding competitor
products
Mandelbrot source code
11/6/2003 email from Adam Bogue to Steve Hotelling
re: DiamondTouch
Forlines et al., “Experiences with an Observations of
Direct-Touch Tabletops” [Bogue, Ex. 3]
1/14/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
demos [Forlines, Ex. 7]
10/31/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
demos [Forlines, Ex. 14]
February 25, 2011 Internal Apple Email Regarding
Competitive Phone Tracker
January 17, 2005 email from Alan Esenther to Chia
Shen and Adam Bogue re: DTFlash on
\\herc\diamondspace
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Take-Apart
KR30-0418547, N.B. Certified translation has unique
bates range following original
JP D1241383, N.B. Certified translation has unique
bates range following original
Apple's 035 Prototype Photos from D'889 File History
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
7/31/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/13/2012
8/15/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
7/31/2012
Apple's 035 Prototype with an authenticating
7/31/2012
stipulation of fact
Consolidated Financial Statements of Samsung
8/16/2012
Electronics Co., Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 2011
8 of 12
Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You may
consider as impeachment evidence.
Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You may
consider as impeachment evidence.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
DX
DX
DX
EXHIBIT
NO.
754.502
754.545
781
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
8/16/2012
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
8/16/2012
Summaries of Samsung Profits Pursuant to FRE 1006 8/16/2012
DX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
900
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1007
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1030
1031
1032
1033
January 6, 2010 e-mail to Jinsoo Kim
iPhone [Physical Device]
iPhone 3G [Physical Device]
iPhone 3GS [Physical Device]
iPhone4 [Physical Device]
iPad [Physical Device]
iPad2 [Physical Device]
Galaxy S (i9000) [Physical Device]
Intercept [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Vibrant [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Captivate [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Epic 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Fascinate [Physical Device]
Transform [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Mesmerize [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Continuum [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Showcase i500 [Physical Device]
Nexus S [Physical Device]
Galaxy S 4G [Physical Device]
Gem [Physical Device]
Galaxy Prevail [Physical Device]
Nexus S 4G [Physical Device]
Replenish [Physical Device]
Droid Charge [Physical Device]
Indulge [Physical Device]
Infuse 4G [Physical Device]
Exhibit 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy Ace [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (AT&T) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (i9100) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) [Physical Device]
8/20/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/16/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
9 of 12
Court's Limiting Instruction
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
EXHIBIT
NO.
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
JX
JX
1041
1042
JX
1043
JX
1044
JX
1045
JX
1046
JX
1047
JX
1048
JX
1049
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
1050
1051
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 7.0 [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi) [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) [Physical Device]
US Trademark Reg for iPhone
Certified copy of US D504,889, issued May 10,2005
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012
Certified copy of US D593,087, issued May 26,2009
Certified copy of US D604,305, issued November 17,
2009
Certified copy of US D618,677, issued June 29, 2010
7/31/2012
8/7/2012
Certified copy of US 7,844,915, issued November 30,
2010
Certified copy of US 7,469,381, issued December 23,
2008
Certified copy of US 7,864,163, issued January 4,
2011
Certified file history of US 7,469,381, issued December
23, 2008
Certified file history of US 7,844,915, issued November
30, 2010
Certified file history of US 7,864,163, issued January 4,
2011
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPhone 3G (iOS 4.x)
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 4.x)
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 4.x)
8/10/2012
7/31/2012
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
10 of 12
Court's Limiting Instruction
Do not consider this as evidence that the D'677 patent is invalid.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
JX
EXHIBIT
NO.
1060
JX
1066
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
1068
1069
1070
1071
1073
1074
1076
1077
1078
1081
1083
1084
JX
1085
JX
JX
JX
1091
1093
1500
PX
2011
PX
2031
PX
2227
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
File wrapper for 7,675,941 (including file histories of
U.S. Patent App. No. 11/417,219, Korean Patent App.
10-2004-0042300, Korean Patent App. 10-20040062190, Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0073552,
Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0093947, Korean Patent
App. 10-2005-0029192), Korean Patent App. 10-20050037774).
File wrapper for U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460 (including
U.S. App. Nos. 11/493,754, 11/003,222, and
09/540,830 and KR App. No. 1999-11179)
U.S. Patent No. 7,456,893
U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460
U.S. Patent No. 7,675,941
U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711
U.S. Patent No. 7,447,516
HP Compaq TC 1000
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 5.x)
Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 5.x)
Fiddler 1994 Tablet Replica
U.S. Patent No. 7,327,349
3GPP TS 25.214 v.6.6.0 (2005-2006)
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #41 Athens, Greece, 913 May 2005, Change Request
3GPP TSG-RAN2 Meeting #47, Athens, Greece, 09th th
13 May 2005, Tdoc R2-051311
MacWorld 2007 Video
LG Prada Phone
STA’s & SEA’s US sales of accused products &
Apple’s sales & revenues of the accused products
Exhibit M of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
Exhibit J of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
2005-08-25 Email from Bederson to John SanGiovanni
re LAunchTiule source
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/13/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
11 of 12
Do not consider this exhibit as prior art to the D'305 patent.
Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
EXHIBIT
NO.
2257
2261
2277
2278
2281
2288
DX
2517
DX
2519
DX
2522
DX
2524
DX
2525
DX
2526
DX
DESCRIPTION
Admitted Exhibit List
ADMITTED
Production Information
Samsung Icon Design for 2011
Pantech Hotshot
Blackberry Storm
iPhone Human Interface Guidelines
June 13, 2005 Swift File (Tablecloth/ Snapping Back)
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
Email 11-18-08 Haining Zhang to Isable-staff re:
Competitive Analysis
Presentation: Mini-Teardown Samsung Galaxy S (TMobile Vibrant) iPod/iPhone New Tech 8.10.10
Email 1-24-11 Eddy Cue to Tim Cook re: Why I Just
Dumped the iPad (Hing: Size Matters)
Email 10-5-05 Steve Jobs to Jony Ive, et al, re:
=?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Fwd:_Samsung=92s_SGH10_Bang_&_Olufsen_=93fas?= =?WINDOWS252?Q?hionphone=94?=
Email 11-7-06 Tony Fadell to Steve Jobs, et al, re:
Samsung Unveils New Communications Device (AP)
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
2528
Nook Color tablet [used by Van Liere as control for
survey]
LG G2x [Physical Device]
DX
2529
Motorola Xoom tablet [Physical Device]
8/10/2012
DX
2534
Motorola Atrix F159 [Physical Device]
8/10/2012
DX
2627
3GSM Congress Trade Show Report
8/15/2012
Court's Limiting Instruction
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
12 of 12
Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Dr. Van
Liere's survey.
Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how Mr.
Poret chose his control devices.
Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Mr. Poret's
study.
Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how Mr.
Poret chose his control devices.
Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or non-infringement.
However, you may consider as evidence of alternative designs
and functionality. The date on the document is incorrect. The
correct date is 2007.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
