Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1717
ORDER Regarding Evidentiary Objections and Sealing. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/13/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
14
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING EVIDENTIARY
OBJECTIONS AND SEALING
The Court made the following rulings on the record at trial:
15
The Court accepted Apple’s redacted exhibit PX25A1.
16
The parties shall include limiting instructions in their list of admitted exhibits.
17
SDX3951.006 was excluded because the device was not timely disclosed on Samsung’s
18
19
exhibit list.
SDX3951.003 was excluded because it contains claim construction argument.
20
Additionally, the Court notes that Apple has been late at least 3 times in filing its objections
21
and responses to objections. Apple’s tardiness is unfair to Samsung. When Apple does not file its
22
objections and responses on time, Apple is given the unfair advantage of previewing Samsung’s
23
arguments. In order to discourage this practice, the Court will deduct trial time from any party that
24
is tardy in filing its objections and responses. For every six minutes past 10:30 a.m. that either
25
party is late, the Court will deduct one minute from that party’s trial time. In addition, the parties
26
shall file, with the objections and responses, an attorney declaration indicating the time at which
27
the objections and responses are being filed.
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND SEALING
1
Finally, the Court revises the standing order with respect to motions to seal in this case
2
only. If either party files an administrative motion to file under seal that requires a supporting
3
declaration from another party pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), the party filing the 79-5(d)
4
declaration must do so within one day of the filing of the administrative motion to seal.
5
Declarations in support of the administrative motions to file under seal at docket numbers 1684 and
6
1711 shall be filed by 6:00 p.m. on August 14, 2012.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: August 13, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND SEALING
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
