Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1544
ORDER Regarding Objections. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/2/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS
18
The Parties have filed multiple rounds of objections regarding the testimony of witnesses
19
Bressler, Kare, Denison, and Schiller. See, e.g., ECF Nos. 1462, 1466. The Court has already
20
ruled on several of these objections on July 30, 2012, and July 31, 2012. See, e.g., ECF Nos. 1511
21
and 1520. The parties filed additional objections to these same witnesses on July 31, 2012. See,
22
e.g., ECF Nos. 1518, 1521, and 1526. The parties then filed yet a third round of objections on
23
August 2, 2012, covering many of the same witnesses, as well as adding a new witness, Mr.
24
Forstall. See ECF Nos. 1540, 1541. The parties then filed a fourth round of corrected objections
25
on August 2, 2012, regarding the same witnesses. See ECF Nos. 1542, 1543.
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS
1
In light of these multiple rounds of objections on the same four witnesses, the Court will
2
assume that the objections filed on July 31, 2012 have been superceded by the corrected objections
3
filed on August 2, 2012, at ECF Nos. 1542 and 1543, and will only rule on these objections.
4
In the future, the parties may only file one set of objections and responses to a witness’s
5
exhibits. Additionally, for all objections related to untimely disclosures, or exhibits that have
6
previously been stricken by either this Court or Judge Grewal, the parties shall indicate the docket
7
number and the page number of the controlling order, as well as the docket number and the page
8
number of the controlling motion to strike or exclude. Finally, in the future, should the parties
9
need to file corrected objections, the parties must refile attachments with the corrected objections.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated: August 2, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
