Cave Consulting Group, LLC v. Ingenix, Inc.
Filing
79
ORDER Regarding Supplemental Claim Construction Briefing. Briefs due by Friday, August 31, 2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 08/10/2012. (ejdlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
8
Cave Consulting Group, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
v.
9
Ingenix, Inc.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Defendant.
11
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:11-CV-0469 EJD
ORDER REGARDING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
13
14
On August 9, 2012, the court held a claim construction hearing in this action. During this
15
hearing, both parties suggested that additional briefing may be useful to the court. The court is
16
interested in the parties’ positions as to (1) whether Dr. Cave disclaimed direct standardization
17
during prosecution of the ’126 patent, (2) the legal relevance of the dependent claims in the ’126
18
patent that teach direct standardization to the construction of the term “weighted episode of care
19
statistics,” and (3) whether the terms “episode of care” and “episode treatment group” are
20
functionally and/or legally distinguishable.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than Friday, August 31, 2012, the
22
parties shall file briefs addressing these questions. These briefs shall not exceed fifteen pages. No
23
responding briefs will be necessary or allowed.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: August 10, 2012
27
28
_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
1
Case No.: 5:11-CV-0469 EJD
ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
