Rich v. Hewlett-Packard Company, No. 5:2006cv03361 - Document 79 (N.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING 78 JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Motion Hearing and Case Managment Conference set for 2/5/2010 AT 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/22/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2009)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rich v. Hewlett-Packard Company 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Doc. 79 PETER SULLIVAN, SBN 101428 PSullivan@gibsondunn.com SAMUEL G. LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578 SLiversidge@gibsondunn.com CHRISTOPHER CHORBA, SBN 216692 CChorba@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071-3197 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 **E-Filed 10/27/2009** Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 CARL K. RICH, et al., Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 CASE NO. C 06 03361-JF (HRL) JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; AND ------------------ ORDER GRANTING [PROPOSED] STIPULATION v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 Counsel for Plaintiffs Carl Rich and David Duran (“Plaintiffs”) and counsel for Defendant 22 Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”), in support of their Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 23 Requesting Further Modification of Hearing and Briefing Schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class 24 Certification and Rescheduling of Case Management Conference, state as follows: 25 1. At the Case Management Conference held on November 30, 2007, the Court set 26 hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification for May 8, 2009. Upon the parties’ stipulated 27 requests, the Court ordered further modifications to this schedule. (Docket Nos. 57, 60, 75.) 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to the current schedule, Plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification and expert report 2 on June 23, 2009, Defendant’s opposition papers and expert reports are due November 5, 2009, 3 Plaintiffs’ reply papers are due December 9, 2009, and the hearing on the motion is set for January 8, 4 2010. By Order dated September 14, 2009, upon further stipulation of the parties, the Court 5 rescheduled the Case Management Conference from September 18, 2009, at 10:30 a.m., to January 8, 6 2010, so that this conference would immediately follow the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class 7 certification. See Order Granting Joint Stipulation Requesting Rescheduling of Case Management 8 Conference; Declaration of Counsel (Docket No. 77). 9 2. Due to the parties’ ongoing discussions and attempt to mediate their differences and 10 the additional time required by Plaintiffs’ counsel to produce documents related to their expert report, 11 the parties request another extension of approximately thirty days for all dates associated with 12 Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The dates to which the parties have agreed, subject to the 13 Court’s approval, are as follows: (a) December 7, 2009, for HP to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ 14 motion for class certification and its expert report(s); (b) January 11, 2010, for Plaintiffs to file their 15 reply papers; and (c) February 5, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., for the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion and the 16 Case Management Conference, or such alternative date and time as the Court may select. 17 3. In addition, the Court previously ordered that, on account of the complexity of the 18 issues to be decided on class certification, the page limit requirements contained in Civil Local 19 Rule 7-3(a) be increased to 35 pages for HP’s opposition. See Order Granting Stipulation Requesting 20 Modification of Hearing and Briefing Schedule Re: Motion for Class Certification (Docket No. 57). 21 4. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, a date of an event or deadline already fixed by Court 22 order may be enlarged or changed if the parties so stipulate; the stipulation is accompanied by a 23 declaration addressing the reasons for the requested change, previous time modifications, and the 24 effect that the requested time modification would have on the schedule set for the case; and the 25 parties obtain an order from the Court approving the requested enlargement of time. 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 5. A declaration of counsel providing the information required by Civil Local Rule 6-2 follows this Stipulation. 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF 1 6. At the present time there are no other pending motions before the court, although HP 2 reserves the right to file a motion for summary judgment on the claims of any individually named 3 plaintiff at any time prior to the last day to file dispositive motions, and to notice the hearing of such 4 motion on or before the date set for hearing Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. 5 7. Therefore, the parties through their counsel respectfully request that the Court enter an 6 order vacating the current hearing date for Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and setting the 7 following new schedule: (a) HP’s opposition papers (and expert reports) are to be filed and served no 8 later than December 7, 2009; (b) Plaintiffs’ reply papers are to be filed and served no later than 9 January 11, 2010; and (c) the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is set for February 5, 10 2010, or such alternative date as the Court may select. The parties further respectfully request that 11 the Case Management Conference be rescheduled to follow the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class 12 certification on February 5, 2010, or such alternative date as the Court may select. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 DATED: October 13, 2009 COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY 16 By: 17 /s/ Justin T. Berger* Attorneys for Plaintiffs CARL RICH and DAVID DURAN 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: October 13, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP PETER SULLIVAN SAMUEL G. LIVERSIDGE CHRISTOPHER CHORBA 23 By: 24 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP /s/ Christopher Chorba* *I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF 1 2 DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER CHORBA IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION 1. I, Christopher Chorba, am an attorney admitted to practice before this Court and all 3 courts of the State of California. I am an associate attorney in the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & 4 Crutcher LLP, attorneys of record for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”). I make this 5 declaration in support of the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Requesting Further Modification 6 of Hearing and Briefing Schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Rescheduling of 7 Case Management Conference. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, and, if called as 8 a witness, I could and would testify competently to those facts. 9 2. At the Case Management Conference held on November 30, 2007, the Court set 10 hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification for May 8, 2009. Upon the parties’ stipulations, 11 the Court has continued these deadlines several times: 12 (a) Upon stipulation of the parties filed January 15, 2009, the Court moved the hearing on 13 Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification to September 19, 2009, and set the following deadlines for 14 briefing on the motion: April 23, 2009, for Plaintiffs’ moving papers; July 22, 2009, for HP’s 15 opposition; and August 26, 2009, for Plaintiffs’ reply papers. See Order Granting Stipulation 16 Requesting Modification of Hearing and Briefing Schedule Re: Motion for Class Certification 17 (Docket No. 57). 18 (b) Upon further stipulation of the parties filed April 23, 2009, the Court moved the 19 hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification to November 20, 2009, and set the following 20 deadlines for briefing on the motion: June 23, 2009, for Plaintiffs’ moving papers; September 22, 21 2009, for HP’s opposition; and October 26, 2009, for Plaintiffs’ reply papers. See Order Granting 22 Stipulation Requesting Further Modification of Hearing and Briefing Schedule Re: Motion for Class 23 Certification (Docket No. 60). 24 (c) Thereafter, by Order dated August 13, 2009, upon the parties’ further stipulated 25 request filed August 12, 2009, the Court continued the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion to January 8, 26 2010, and set the following briefing deadlines: November 5, 2009, for Defendant’s opposition papers 27 and expert reports; and December 9, 2009 for Plaintiffs’ reply papers. See Order Granting Joint 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF 1 Stipulation Requesting Further Modification of Hearing and Briefing Schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion 2 for Class Certification; Declaration of Counsel (Docket No. 75). 3 (d) In addition, by Order dated September 14, 2009, upon further stipulation of the parties 4 filed September 10, 2009, the Court rescheduled the Case Management Conference from September 5 18, 2009, at 10:30 a.m., to January 8, 2010, immediately following the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion 6 for class certification. See Order Granting Joint Stipulation Requesting Rescheduling of Case 7 Management Conference; Declaration of Counsel (Docket No. 77). 8 9 3. The parties remain involved in ongoing discussions and an attempt to mediate their differences, and it is the desire of both parties to continue focusing on these efforts and bring them to 10 a resolution before briefing Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, which may be ultimately 11 unnecessary if the parties are able to resolve their dispute. In addition, Plaintiffs' counsel has 12 required additional time to produce documents related to their expert report. HP served its document 13 requests related to Plaintiffs’ expert report on July 8, 2009, and agreed to a thirty-day extension for 14 Plaintiffs’ written responses. Plaintiffs served their written responses on September 21, 2009, and 15 they have not yet produced documents in response to these requests. 16 4. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to an extension of approximately thirty days for 17 all dates associated with Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The dates to which the parties have 18 agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, are as follows: (a) HP’s opposition papers (and expert 19 reports) are to be filed and served no later than December 7, 2009; (b) Plaintiffs’ reply papers are to 20 be filed and served no later than January 11, 2010; and (c) the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class 21 certification is set for February 5, 2010, or such alternative date as the Court may select. The parties 22 have further agreed and respectfully submit that it would be more efficient to have the Case 23 Management Conference follow the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification on February 24 5, 2010, or such alternative date as the Court may select. 25 5. The original complaint was filed on May 22, 2006. There have been several 26 continuances since then, in addition to the extensions referenced in paragraph 2. By stipulation filed 27 in June 2006, HP’s deadline for filing a responsive pleading was extended. On August 31, 2006, the 28 5 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF 1 Court approved the parties’ stipulated request to continue the initial case management conference. 2 On October 10, 2006, the Court approved the parties’ stipulated request to further continue the initial 3 case management conference, and to extend deadlines to complete the ADR process and for HP to 4 respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. The case management conference was subsequently 5 further continued to March 9, 2007. After dismissal of the First Amended Complaint, with leave to 6 amend, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, and stipulated to an extension of time for HP 7 to respond thereto. 8 9 10 6. As discussed above in paragraph 2, the parties have sought and received three prior extensions to the deadlines for Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. 7. The Court has not set any dates other than that for hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for 11 class certification and the Case Management Conference, both currently scheduled for January 8, 12 2010. Therefore, granting the time modification and rescheduling as requested in the parties’ 13 stipulation will not require extensions to any other deadlines. 14 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Los Angeles, California, on October 13, 2009. 17 18 19 20 By: /s/ Christopher Chorba* *I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 6 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 CARL K. RICH, et al., Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. C 06 03361-JF (HRL) -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE The Court having reviewed the parties’ stipulation and the accompanying declaration of counsel to further modify the hearing and briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and reschedule the Case Management Conference, and having found good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED as follows: The Court VACATES the current hearing date of January 8, 2010, for Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The Court sets the following new schedule with respect to Plaintiffs’ motion: Defendant’s opposition papers and expert reports are to be filed and served no later than December 7, 2009; Plaintiffs’ reply papers are to be filed and served no later than January 11, 2010; and the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is set for February 5, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF 1 2 The Court further reschedules the Case Management Conference from January 8, 2010, to February 5, 2010, immediately following the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10/22/2009 Date: _________________ ______________________________________ HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C 06 03361 JF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I, Dhananjay S. Manthripragada, declare as follows: 3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; I am over the age of 4 eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 333 South Grand Avenue, 5 Los Angeles, CA 90071 in said County and State. 6 I hereby certify that on October 13, 2009, the following documents were electronically 7 transmitted to the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System: JOINT STIPULATION 8 REQUESTING FURTHER MODIFICATION OF HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 9 FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RESCHEDULING OF 10 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; AND 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION. I further certify that copies of the 12 foregoing documents were transmitted on October 13, 2009, via e-mail to each of the persons named 13 on the attached Service List. I caused each such document to be transmitted by PDF Format, to the 14 parties and e-mail addresses indicated on the attached Service List. 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. DATED: October 13, 2009 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 17 By: 18 /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada* Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 19 20 *I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled document. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. C 06 03361 JF Service List 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Counsel for Plaintiffs Brian S. Kabateck Alfredo Torrijos Claudia E. Candelas Kabateck Brown Kellner, LLP 644 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: (213) 217-5000 Fax: (213) 217-5010 bsk@kbklawyers.com at@kbklawyers.com cc@kbklawyers.com Niall P. McCarthy Laura E. Schlichtmann Justin T. Berger Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy San Francisco Airport Office Center 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 Tel: (650) 697-6000 Fax: (650) 692-3606 nmccarthy@cpmlegal.com lschlichtmann@cpmlegal.com jberger@cpmlegal.com Stephen M. Garcia David Medby The Garcia Law Firm One World Trade Center, Suite 1950 Long Beach, CA 90831 Tel: (562) 216-5270 Fax: (562) 216-5271 sgarcia@lawgarcia.com dmedby@lawgarcia.com Patrick McNicholas McNicholas & McNicholas LLP 10866 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90024 Tel: (310) 474-1582 Fax: (310) 475-7871 pmc@mcnicholaslaw.com cjs@mcnicholaslaw.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Bruce L. Simon Esther L. Klisura Pearson, Simon, Warshaw & Penny LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1430 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 433-9000 Fax: (415) 433-9008 bsimon@pswplaw.com eklisura@pswplaw.com 100743142_2.DOC 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. C 06 03361 JF
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
