Chacon et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
Filing
13
ORDER re 11 MOTION to Remand filed by Alfredo P. Chacon, Sr., Donna D. Chacon. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 8/1/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
ALFREDO P. CHACON, SR., et al.,
6
Plaintiffs,
No. C 12-3809 PJH
7
v.
ORDER
8
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
LP, et al.,
10
Defendants.
_______________________________/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
The court is in receipt of a chambers copy of a motion to remand filed by plaintiffs in
13
the above-entitled action on July 31, 2012. The court cannot consider the motion in the
14
format presented. First, there are approximately 30 exhibits that are attached to the
15
memorandum of points and authorities, but which are unaccompanied by any declaration or
16
request for judicial notice. The court will not consider exhibits submitted with a motion
17
unless they are authenticated by a declaration, or if self-authenticating, are at a minimum
18
attached to a declaration that explains what they are, see Fed. R. Evid. 901, 902; Civ. L.R.
19
7-2(d), 7-5; or if subject to judicial notice, are attached to an appropriate request for judicial
20
notice. See Fed. R. Evid. 201.
21
Second, the exhibits are not tabbed. It is not possible for the court to locate
22
particular exhibits in a large stack of paper unless the exhibits are tabbed. The court has
23
many many cases on its docket, and will not consider any exhibits that it cannot locate with
24
reasonable facility.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: August 1, 2012
28
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
