Varela et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Wells Fargo Home Mortgage filed by Jaime Varela, Noelia L Varela, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. Signed by Judge Kandis Westmore on 8/20/12. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012)
Case4:12-cv-03502-KAW Document21 Filed08/16/12 Page1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAIME VARELA et al.,
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WELLS FARGO HOME
,
MORTGAGE et al.,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
CASE NO. ______________________
4:12-cv-03502-KAW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
✔
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
✔
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________
August 3, 2012
____________________________
/s/ September J. Katje
Attorney for Plaintiff s Jaime and Noelia L. Varela
Dated:____________
August 3, 2012
____________________________
/s/ Daniel A. Armstrong
Attorney for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
Case4:12-cv-03502-KAW Document21 Filed08/16/12 Page2 of 3
CASE NO.: 4:12-cv-03502-KAW
[PROPOSED] ORDER
X
9
9
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 08/20/12
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
MAGISTRATE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Case4:12-cv-03502-KAW Document21 Filed08/16/12 Page3 of 3
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action.
3 I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling,
Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena,
4 California 91101-2459.
5
On August 16, 2012, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled:
6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
7 on the interested parties in said case as follows:
8
9
Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System
10
Counsel for Plaintiffs:
11
September J. Katjie, Esq.
Consumer Litigation Law Center, APC
100 N. Barranca, Suite 700
West Covina, CA 91791
Tel: 800.787.5616; Fax: 888.909.7647
email: sk@consumerlitigationlawcenter.com
12
13
14
15
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar
16 of this Court, at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena,
California on August 16, 2012.
17
18
Carol Goodwin
19
(Type or Print Name)
/s/ Carol Goodwin
(Signature of Declarant)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR0469/00441694-1
1
CASE NO.: 4:12-CV- 03502-KAW
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?