Lisnawati v. Homeward Residential et al
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/31/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 08/22/12. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
SHAINA LISNAWATI,
No. C-12-02692 DMR
7
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
8
v.
9
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL,
11
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
12
Defendant Homeward Residential has filed a motion to dismiss. [Docket No. 12.] Currently,
13
the motion is set for a court hearing on September 27, 2012. Plaintiff Shaina Lisnawati is pursuing
14
this action without legal representation. According to the local Court rules, Plaintiff should have
15
filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by August 16, 2012. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-3.
16
The court has received no such opposition.
17
The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by August 31, 2012 and explain her failure to
18
respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit her opposition(s) to the
19
court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not
20
indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff’s late submission. If Plaintiff does not
21
respond by August 31, 2012, Defendant’s motion may be granted.
22
The court further ORDERS that Defendant shall file a reply, if any, to Plaintiff's opposition
23
no later than September 11, 2012.
RT
R NIA
onna
Judge D
H
ER
M. Ryu
FO
NO
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
LI
27
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
Dated: August 22, 2012
26
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
S
24
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
