Birkhead v. Parker et al
Filing
34
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS 29 RE-NOTICE FILED ON JULY 26, 2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/1/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
MARK BIRKHEAD,
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 12-2264 CW
Plaintiff,
v.
OLIVER PARKER, an individual;
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Washington
Corporation, DOES 1 through 4,
inclusive,
ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S RENOTICE FILED ON
JULY 26, 2012,
Docket No. 29.
Defendants.
________________________________/
13
14
On July 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a “First Amended Re-Notice
15
of Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss,” Docket No. 29, attempting to
16
set a hearing for August 30, 2012.
17
a hearing on that day.
18
order, Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss has been deemed an opposition
19
to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, as well as a motion to remand
20
the action to state court.
21
submission on the papers.
22
The Court declines to calendar
Pursuant to the Court's July 26, 2012
The Court has taken both motions under
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
8/1/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
