Xerox Corporation v. Content Management Corporation
Filing
17
ORDER re 16 Letter filed by Xerox Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/10/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
XEROX CORPORATION,
Plaintiff(s),
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
12
CONTENT
CORPORATION,
No. C-12-01853 DMR
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
MANAGEMENT
13
14
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
15
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
16
Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS the request of counsel for Plaintiff for leave to
17
appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference scheduled for August 22, 2012. The court
18
determines that personal attendance is not needed in order to have an effective conference, so long
19
as Plaintiff is represented by lead trial counsel who (1) shall be prepared to address all of the matters
20
referred to in the Northern District of California’s general standing order on Joint Case Management
21
Statements and the Undersigned's standing order; and (2) have full authority to enter stipulations and
22
make admissions pursuant to those orders. This order does not give counsel permission to appear
23
telephonically at all subsequent hearings in this case. Counsel must make a specific and timely
24
application to appear telephonically at any hearing and must demonstrate good cause for permission
25
to make a telephonic appearance.
26
27
28
1
Parties appearing by telephone must follow the protocol set forth in the attached Notice re
2
Telephonic Appearance Procedures for Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Failure to comply
3
with the procedures ordered herein may result in sanctions.
Dated: August 10, 2012
7
RT
8
10
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ER
H
9
LI
NO
u
DONNA M. RYU
a M. Ry
DonnJudge
United States dge
JuMagistrate
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
A
6
TED
GRAN
R NIA
5
FO
UNIT
ED
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1
2
3
NOTICE RE TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE PROCEDURES FOR
MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA M. RYU
EFFECTIVE APRIL 11, 2012
I. POLICY GOVERNING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES
4
11
A party representative (or a party if in pro se) generally must appear in person for a hearing or
case management conference. Permission to attend by telephone may be granted, in the Court's
discretion, upon written request made at least one week in advance of the hearing if the Court
determines that good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is
not needed in order to have an effective hearing or conference. The facts establishing good cause
must be set forth in the request. All telephonic appearances must be made through CourtCall, an
independent conference call company, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section II. If an
individual schedules a telephonic appearance and then fails to respond to the call of a matter on
calendar, the Court may pass the matter or may treat the failure to respond as a failure to appear.
Scheduling simultaneous telephonic appearances in multiple courts does not excuse a failure to
appear. Individuals making use of the conference call service are cautioned that they do so at their
own risk. Hearings generally will not be rescheduled due to missed connections.
12
II. SCHEDULING A TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE.
5
6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
13
14
15
If the Court grants a party's request for telephonic appearance, the party shall arrange for the
appearance by calling CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 not later than 3:00 p.m. the court day prior
to the hearing date.
16
III. PROCEDURE FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE.
17
Court Call will provide counsel with written confirmation of a telephonic appearance, and give
counsel a number to call to make the telephonic appearance. It is counsel's responsibility to dial
into the call not later than 10 minutes prior to the scheduled hearing.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CourtCall does not place a call to counsel.
The initial charge per participant for a CourtCall appearance is $30.00 for the first 45 minutes
you are connected. For each additional 15 minute increment the charge is $7.00. If you do not
timely call and connect with the Court Call operator, you will be billed for the call and the
hearing may proceed in your absence.
Telephonic appearances are connected directly with the courtroom's public address system and
electronic recording equipment so that a normal record is produced. To ensure the quality of
the record, the use of car phones, cellular phones, speakerphones,
public telephone booths, or phones in other public places is prohibited except in the most extreme
emergencies. Participants should be able to hear all parties without difficulty or echo.
27
28
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
At the time of your hearing, you may initially be in the listening mode in which case you will be
able to hear the case before yours just as if you were in the courtroom. After your call is connected
to the courtroom, the Judge will call the case, request appearances, and direct the manner in which
the hearing proceeds. Each time you speak, you should identify yourself for the record. The court's
teleconferencing system allows more than one speaker to be heard, so the Judge can interrupt a
speaker to ask a question or redirect the discussion. When the Judge informs the participants that
the hearing is completed, you may disconnect and the next case will be called.
Telephonic appearances by multiple participants are only possible when there is compliance with
every procedural requirement. Sanctions may be imposed when there is any deviation from the
required procedures or the Court determines that a person's conduct makes telephonic appearances
inappropriate. Sanctions may include dropping a matter from calendar, continuing the hearing,
proceeding in the absence of an unavailable participant, a monetary sanction, and/or a permanent
prohibition against a person appearing telephonically.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Court Call Telephone Appearance Procedure
3/28/2012
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
