Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part Stipulation re Briefing Schedule: Granting Request to Extend Time for Defendant Apple, Inc. to Answer or otherwise Respond to Class Action Complaint; and denying Request to Set Briefing Schedule re 16 Stipulation (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
MARIA PIROZZI, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
vs.
APPLE INC.,
Case No.: 12-CV-1529 YGR
ORDER GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION RE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE:
GRANTING REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT APPLE INC. TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT; AND DENYING REQUEST TO
SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE
16
17
18
Defendant.
The parties’ request to extend the time for Defendant Apple Inc. to answer or otherwise
19
respond to the class action complaint is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to
20
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint by October 5, 2012. The parties’ request to set a briefing schedule
21
is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew the request and show good cause.
22
This Order Terminates Docket Number 16.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Date: August 27, 2012
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
