Tate v. State of California et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Denying 15 Request to Enter Protective Order per Stipulation. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 KAREN TATE, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 9 Case No.: 12-CV-1441 YGR ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO ENTER PROTECTIVE ORDER PER STIPULATION vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Defendant(s). The parties have submitted for the Court's approval a stipulation for protective order 13 concerning confidential information that may be produced during discovery. (Dkt. No. 15 14 15 [“Stipulation”].) Included in this Stipulation are provisions that would: (1) permit the parties to file 16 under seal any pleading, motion paper, deposition transcript or other document that includes 17 material designated by the filing party as confidential unless the Court “requires any further act by 18 the parties as a precondition to filing of the documents under seal” [Stipulation at ¶7]; and (2) 19 20 require counsel to inform persons viewing confidential material that the “Court has enjoined” the 21 use of that information or disclosure of that information except in connection with this litigation 22 [Stipulation at ¶5(b)]. 23 The Court cannot approve a broad protective order that, in essence, allows each party to 24 select the portions of the record will be sealed and, therefore, not made part of the public record. 25 26 See Civil L. R. 79-5, see generally Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665 (9th Cir. 2010). 27 Nor can the Court approve a protective order that predetermines how documents designated by a 28 party as confidential will be treated by the Court when offered in conjunction with dispositive 1 motions or at trial. See Kamakana v. City of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). Rule 26(c) 2 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires the Court to determine whether good cause exists to 3 seal any part of the record of a case. When sealing of documents is sought in connection with a 4 dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking to keep the document out of the public record must 5 provide the most compelling of reasons. Id.; Pintos, 605 F.3d at 678. Moreover, any sealing order 6 7 must be narrowly tailored to remove from the public record only those portions of documents as to 8 which good cause or compelling reasons have been shown. 9 10 Accordingly, no document shall be filed under seal without a court order narrowly tailored to cover only the documents or particular portions of the document for which good cause or United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 compelling reasons exist. If a party wishes to file a document under seal, that party must first file a 13 written motion for a sealing order, setting forth facts to support a finding of good cause and 14 accompanied by a proposed order that is narrowly tailored as specified above. In making any such 15 request, parties shall comply with the procedures set forth in Civil L.R. 79-5. 16 Finally, paragraph three of the Stipulation does not conform to this Court’s Standing Order 17 18 concerning discovery-related disputes. Any future stipulation and proposed order shall indicate that 19 with respect to any disputes over designation of confidential information or disclosure of 20 confidential information to an expert will comply with this Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases, 21 paragraph 8(b). 22 The parties shall revise and resubmit the proposed stipulation and order in accordance with 23 24 25 26 27 this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: August 6, 2012 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?