Kennedy v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Filing
51
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE TO BE HELD NO LATER THAN 8/31/12. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/21/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
TERRY KENNEDY, an individual,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 12-cv-00952-YGR
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR
ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
vs.
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, successor in
8 interest to QUICK LOAN FUNDING,
formally a California corporation;
9 RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a whollyowned subsidiary of BANK OF AMERICA,
10 N.A..; and all persons or entities unknown
claiming any legal or equitable right, title,
11 estate, lien or interest in the property described
in this Compl. adverse to Plaintiff’s title
12 thereto, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
13
Defendants.
14
15
The Court refers this matter to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a
16
17
18
telephone conference to assess whether referral to mediation or a settlement conference might
assist the parties in consummating the settlement reported to the court by notice filed on July 17,
2012. Plaintiff personally shall participate in this telephone conference, along with his counsel
19 and defense counsel. The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time that the telephone
20 conference will be held. The telephone conference shall be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as
21 possible, but no later than August 31, 2012. Plaintiff's counsel shall make her best efforts to notify
22 plaintiff of this order and of the date and time of the telephone conference scheduled by the ADR
23 Unit. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation
24 for further ADR proceedings.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: August 21, 2012
27
28
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?