Bluestone Innovations Texas LLC v. OSRAM GmbH et al
Filing
87
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/8/2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, LTD.,
7
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 12-CV-731 YGR
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
vs.
OSRAM AG, OSRAM OPTO
SEMICONDUCTORS GMBH, OSRAM
OPTO SEMICONDUCTORS, INC., and
OSRAM SYLVANIA INC.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
15
A Case Management Conference was held on August 6, 2012, and the Court hereby enters
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
the Case Management Order as follows:
Event
Samsung must serve Initial Disclosure of Asserted
Claims and Infringement Contentions (PLR 3-1)
and Initial Document Production (PLR 3-2)
OSRAM must serve Invalidity Contentions (PLR
3-3) and Document Production Accompanying
Invalidity Contentions (PLR 3-4)
Parties must exchange Proposed Terms for
Construction (PLR 4-1)
Simultaneous Exchange of Preliminary Claim
Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence (PLR 4-2)
Parties must complete and file Joint Claim
Construction and Prehearing Statement (PLR 4-3)
Deadline
10/22/2012
Deadline to Amend Pleadings
Parties must complete all Claim Construction
Discovery (PLR 4-4)
3/25/2013
4/10/2013
12/6/2012
12/20/2012
1/10/2013
3/11/2013
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
Samsung’s Opening Claim Construction Brief due
(PLR 4-5)
OSRAM must serve responsive brief and
supporting evidence (PLR 4-5)
Samsung must serve and file reply brief and any
evidence directly rebutting the supporting
evidence contained therein (PLR 4-5)
4/25/2013
Technology Tutorial
Claim Construction hearing (PLR 4-6)
Advice of Counsel defense requirements due (PLR
3-7)
Friday, May 31, 2013
Friday, June 7, 2013
50 days after claim construction
ruling
5/13/2013
5/20/2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
The Court FURTHER ORDERS that the parties supplement the process of identifying the
claims terms to be construed. For each claim, each party shall identify with specificity the intended
impact of the proposed constructions on the merits of the case and exchange the same. The Joint
Claim Construction Statement shall include each party's impact statement for each claim to be
construed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Date: August 8, 2012
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
