Blinky, Inc v. EMT Lighting, Inc et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. Each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012) Modified on 8/10/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page1 of 4 1 2 Anne Hiaring Hocking, Cal. Bar No. 88639 anne@hiaringsmith.com Vijay K. Toke, Cal. Bar No. 215079 vijay@hiaringsmith.com 3 6 HIARING + SMITH, LLP 101 Lucas Valley Road, Suite 300 San Rafael, CA 94903 Telephone: (415) 457-2040 Facsimile: (415) 457-2822 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BLINKY INC. 4 5 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) EMT LIGHTING, INC., a California Corporation, EMT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a ) Nevada Corporation, EMT TECHNOLOGIES, ) ) a sole proprietorship, GEORGE DANIEL ) WALLER, an individual, ROBERT HENDERSON, an individual, and DOES 1 – ) ) 100, ) Defendants. ) ) ) BLINKY INC., a California Corporation, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No.: CV-11-05487 SBA STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]; ORDER Action Filed 11/10/2011 20 21 //// 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 CV-11-05487 SBA: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page2 of 4 1 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY 3 STIPULATED by and between BLINKY, INC. (”Plaintiff” and “Counterdefendant”) and GEORGE 4 DANIEL WALLER and SHERRY J. WALLER, as Husband & Wife dba ENERGY 5 MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES (“Defendants” and “Counterclaimants”), by and through their 6 respective counsel of record herein, that the entirety of the above-captioned action, including 7 Plaintiff’s Complaint as to all named defendants, and all claims therein, Counterclaimant’s 8 Counterclaims, and all claims therein, shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and all claims 9 against DOE defendants shall be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 10 11 The parties further stipulate and request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement in this action. 12 The parties stipulate that each party is to bear its own fees and costs. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 DATED: August 7, 2012 HIARING + SMITH LLP 15 16 By: _/s/ Vijay K. Toke____ Vijay K. Toke Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant BLINKY, INC. 17 18 19 20 DATED: August 7, 2012 NEWHOUSE & ASSOCIATES 21 By: __/David E. Newhouse/__ David E. Newhouse Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimant GEORGE DANIEL WALLER and SHERRY J. WALLER, as Husband & Wife dba ENERGY MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES 22 23 24 25 /// 26 27 28 2 CV-11-05487 SBA: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page3 of 4 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6 Dated: 8/9/12 _ The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 CV-11-05487 SBA: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MARIN 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I am employed in the County of Marin, State of California; my business address is 101 Lucas Valley Road, Suite 300, San Rafael, California 94903; I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. On August 7, 2012, I served the following document(s): 1. STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)];ORDER on the parties shown below: David E. Newhouse, Esq. Newhouse & Associates Twin Oaks Office Plaza, Suite 112 477 Ninth Avenue San Mateo, CA 94402 Attorney for Defendants & Counterclaimants: George Daniel Waller Sherry J. Waller Husband and Wife dba Energy Management Technologies 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 __X__ (BY MAIL) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for the processing of mail; on this date, the above-referenced documents were placed for collection and delivery by the U.S. Postal Service following ordinary business practices. 17 18 __X__ Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. 19 20 21 Executed this 7th day of August 2012 at San Rafael, California. 22 /s/ Gerie Johnson Gerie Johnson 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case No. CV-11-05487 SBA 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?