Reyes v. San Francisco Unified School District
Filing
143
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 142 MOTION for Reconsideration re 141 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Leave of Court to File MOTION for Recusal filed by San Francisco Unified School District. The Court VACATES the hearing date of 9/4/12 set by Defendant for the Motion for Leave. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/21/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
MARGARET REYES,
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
9
vs.
Case No.: 11-cv-04628-YGR
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE A MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
Defendant.
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
On August 20, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion for Leave of Court to File a Motion for
Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to File Under Seal Deposition
Transcripts and Documents in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion
for Leave”). (Dkt. No. 142.) The Court considers Defendant’s Motion for Leave to be its Motion for
Reconsideration (hereinafter, “Motion”).
15
As to the Mike Quinn email, Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant’s Motion, not to
16
exceed three pages, regarding whether the attorney-client privilege exists and/or has been waived.
17
Plaintiff shall file this brief by noon on Friday, August 24, 2012. Defendant shall file a reply brief,
18
not to exceed three pages, by noon on Monday, August 27, 2012.
19
The Court hereby STAYS the portion of its Order at Dkt. No. 141 (Order Denying Plaintiff’s
20
Motion to File Under Seal Deposition Transcripts and Documents in Opposition to Defendant’s
21
Motion for Summary Judgment (“Order”)) as to the Mike Quinn email pending resolution of the
22
attorney-client privilege issue raised by Defendant. Plaintiff is directed to publicly-file the deposition
23
transcripts addressed in the Order (and which are not at issue in Defendant’s Motion) by no later than
24
Wednesday, August 22, 2012.
25
The Court will address these issues at the summary judgment hearing on August 28, 2012 at
26
2:00 p.m. The Court hereby VACATES the hearing date of September 4, 2012 set by Defendant for the
27
Motion for Leave.
28
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 21, 2012
_________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
