Fahey et al v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Filing
36
ORDER VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE The Court VACATES the Compliance Hearing scheduled for 8/31/12 at 9:01am. A Case Management Conference is set for Monday, 9/24/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/28/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
THOMAS D. FAHEY, et al.,
6
Plaintiffs,
7
vs.
Case No.: C-11-04516-YGR
ORDER VACATING COMPLIANCE HEARING
AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
8
9
MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.,
Defendant.
10
11
The parties filed a Notice of Tentative Settlement Agreement and Request to Continue Case
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
Management Conference on June 25, 2012. (Dkt. No. 31.) The Compliance Hearing originally
13
scheduled for August 3, 2012 was continued by request of the parties to allow for finalization of the
14
settlement agreement. The parties now request that the August 31, 2012 Compliance Hearing be
15
continued for the same reason. (Dkt. No. 35.) The Court hereby VACATES the Compliance Hearing
16
scheduled for August 31, 2012. However, the Court sets a Case Management Conference for
17
September 24, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California in
18
Courtroom 5.
19
The parties shall immediately file a stipulation of dismissal if the settlement agreement is
20
finalized. If the case has not settled by that time, personal appearances will be required at the Case
21
Management Conference. The parties shall file a joint update/status report no later than five (5)
22
business days prior to the Case Management Conference.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 28, 2012
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
