Stutson v. Bureau of Prisons
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A SECOND ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 10/5/2012 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/22/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
TANYA STUTSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
vs.
Case No.: C-11-03979-YGR
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR A SECOND’S ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO
FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
BUREAU OF PRISONS and DOES 1 through 50,
Defendants.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Case Status Response, Dkt. No. 42, mailed on August 3,
14
2012, which requests an additional 60 days to file an amended complaint. The Court will grant the
15
request.
16
Accordingly, the deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint is hereby EXTENDED
17
from June 25, 2012 to October 2, 2012. No further extensions of the deadline to file an amended
18
complaint shall be granted. Any response to the amended complaint must be filed within 30 days
19
after the amended complaint is filed.
20
A compliance hearing regarding the filing of an amended complaint shall be held on Friday,
21
October 5, 2012, on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street,
22
Oakland, California, in Courtroom 5. If Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the parties need not
23
appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. If Plaintiff has not filed an amended
24
complaint, the case shall be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: August 22, 2012
26
27
28
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
