CAI International Inc v. South Atlantic Container Lines Ltd et al
Filing
46
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS 45 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/20/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
v.
SOUTH ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINES,
LTD.; MARUBA S.C.A. EMPRESA DE
NAVEGACIO MARITIMA; and EMPRESA
DE NAVEGACION MARUBA S.A.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
________________________________/
Plaintiff CAI International, Inc. has filed a motion for
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, OR
PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AGAINST
EACH DEFENDANT
Defendants.
10
11
No. C 11-2403 CW
summary judgment or, in the alternative, for partial summary
judgment, and has noticed its motion for hearing on September 27,
2012.
Docket No. 45.
The Court previously set December 13, 2012
as the deadline to hear all case dispositive motions.
42.
Docket No.
At that time, the Court also instructed the parties to file
their case dispositive motions as cross-motions.
Id.
The Court prefers to hear all case dispositive motions at one
time, absent a good reason to do otherwise.
Plaintiff’s motion
may be heard on the date noticed as long as Defendants South
Atlantic Container Lines, Ltd., Empresa de Navegacion Maruba S.A.
and Maruba S.C.A. Empresa De Navegacion Maritima, now known as
Maritima Maruba, S.A., are prepared to oppose it and no party
intends to file another case dispositive motion at a later date.
The parties shall meet and confer about the schedule and file an
appropriate motion under L.R. 7-11 if they are unable to agree.
1
If Defendants wish to file a cross-motion for summary
2
judgment, the parties shall adhere to the briefing schedule set
3
forth in the case management order.
4
file, in a single brief, their cross-motion and their opposition
5
to Plaintiff’s motion, two weeks after Plaintiff filed its motion.
6
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ cross-motion and reply in
7
support of its motion, contained in a single brief, shall be due
8
one week thereafter.
9
cross-motion shall be due one week thereafter.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
That is, Defendants shall
Defendants’ reply in support of their
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated: 8/20/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
