Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund v. Barclays Capital Inc. et al, No. 4:2011cv01064 - Document 89 (N.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: Order Granting 88 STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND HEARING DATE. Amended Pleadings due by 12/8/2011. Motions due by 1/26/2012. Replies due by 3/8/2012. Responses due by 2/23/2012. Motion Hearing set for 3/22/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/12/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund v. Barclays Capital Inc. et al Doc. 89 1 CHRISTOPHER BURKE (214799) WALTER W. NOSS (277580) 2 KRISTEN M. ANDERSON (246108) SCOTT+SCOTT LLP 3 707 Broadway, 10th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 4 Tel: 619-233-4565 Fax: 619-233-0508 5 cburke@scott-scott.com wnoss@scott-scott.com 6 kanderson@scott-scott.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 PIPE FITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 120 12 PENSION FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC., THE 16 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., KOHLBERG KRAVIS ROBERTS & CO. 17 L.P., VESTAR CAPITAL PARTNERS INC., CENTERVIEW PARTNERS LLC, and 18 PETER J. MOSES, 19 Defendants. 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 11-CV-01064-CW STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND HEARING DATE Judge: The Hon. Claudia Wilken Courtroom: 2, 4th Floor WHEREAS on August 30, 2011, the Court entered an order establishing a deadline for 22 Plaintiff to file the Second Amended Complaint, a briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion(s) 23 to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, and continuing the mediation deadline (ECF 24 No. 84); 25 WHEREAS on September 16, 2011, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court 26 entered an order extending the deadlines for Plaintiff to file the Second Amended Complaint, 27 modifying the briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion(s) to Dismiss the Second Amended 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE – No. 11-CV-01064-CW -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 Complaint and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, and continuing the mediation deadline 2 (ECF No. 87); 3 WHEREAS the parties now agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file the Second 4 Amended Complaint, modify the briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion(s) to Dismiss the 5 Second Amended Complaint, and continue the mediation deadline; 6 WHEREAS on October 6, 2011, the parties to the In re Del Monte Foods Co. S’holder 7 Litig., Consolidated C.A. No. 6027-VCL (Del. Ch.), filed a Stipulation and Agreement of 8 Compromise and Settlement that seeks to certify a proposed settlement class as a non opt-out 9 class pursuant to Court of Chancery Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1) and 23(b)(2) and purports to release all 10 putative class claims arising out of the acquisition of Del Monte Foods Company on March 8, 11 2011, including Plaintiff’s claims in this action; 12 WHEREAS the parties to the Delaware Action seek a final approval hearing on the 13 proposed settlement in the Court of Chancery on December 1, 2011; 14 WHEREAS it is Plaintiff’s position that it needs additional time to consider the effect of 15 the proposed settlement of the Delaware Litigation in this action; 16 WHEREAS Defendants reserve the right to move to stay this action in light of the 17 proposed settlement of the Delaware Litigation; 18 WHEREAS pursuant to stipulation by the parties, the Court previously modified the 19 briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 20 75), and the Court previously modified the deadline for Plaintiff to file the Second Amended 21 Complaint, the briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion(s) to Dismiss the Second Amended 22 Complaint, and the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 87); 23 WHEREAS pending a ruling from the Court on Defendants’ anticipated Motion(s) to 24 Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, the time modification does not presently impact the 25 remaining schedule set out in the Case Management Order; 26 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 27 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE – No. 11-CV-01064-CW -2- 1 1. The deadline for Plaintiff to file the Second Amended Complaint shall now be 2 December 8, 2011. 3 2. Defendants’ Motion(s) to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint shall be due 4 on January 26, 2012; Plaintiff’s opposition brief shall be due on February 23, 2012; and 5 Defendants’ reply brief(s) shall be due on March 8, 2012. 6 3. The hearing date for Defendants’ Motion(s) to Dismiss the Second Amended 7 Complaint shall now be March 22, 2012 at 2 p.m. 8 4. The mediation deadline shall now be April 30, 2012. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 10 DATED: October 11, 2011 11 12 13 14 15 16 SCOTT+SCOTT LLP CHRISTOPHER M. BURKE WALTER W. NOSS KRISTEN M. ANDERSON 707 Broadway, 10th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 233-4565 Facsimile: (619) 233-0508 Email: cburke@scott-scott.com wnoss@scott-scott.com kanderson@scott-scott.com By /s/ Christopher M. Burke Christopher M. Burke 17 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. K. CRAIG WILDFANG (pro hac vice) THOMAS J. UNDLIN (pro hac vice) STACEY P. SLAUGHTER (pro hac vice) 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015 Telephone: 612-349-8500 Facsimile: 612-339-4181 Email: kcwildfang@rkmc.com tjundlin@rkmc.com spslaughter@rkmc.com 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE – No. 11-CV-01064-CW -3- THE MOGIN LAW FIRM, P.C. DANIEL J. MOGIN MATTHEW T. SINNOTT 707 Broadway, 10th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619-687-6611 Facsimile: 619-687-6610 Email: dmogin@moginlaw.com msinnott@moginlaw.com 1 2 3 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Pipefitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund 6 7 DATED: October 11, 2011 8 9 10 11 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP BRENDAN P. CULLEN 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303-3308 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 Email: cullenb@sullcrom.com By /s/ Brendan P. Cullen Brendan P. Cullen 12 Attorneys for Defendants Barclays Capital Inc. and Peter J. Moses 13 14 DATED: October 11, 2011 15 16 17 18 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP BRIAN BERRY (Bar No. 229893) 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 Email: brian.berry@lw.com By /s/ Brian Berry Brian Berry 19 22 WILLIAM R. SHERMAN (admitted pro hac vice) 555 Eleventh Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 Telephone: (202) 637-2200 Facsimile: (202) 637-2201 Email: william.sherman@lw.com 23 By 20 21 24 /s/ William R. Sherman William R. Sherman Attorneys for Defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE – No. 11-CV-01064-CW -4- 1 DATED: October 11, 2011 4 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP HARRISON J. FRAHN 2550 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5065 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 Email: hfrahn@stblaw.com 5 By 2 3 6 /s/ Harrison J. Frahn Harrison J. Frahn SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP JOSEPH F. TRINGALI (pro hac vice) PAUL C. GLUCKOW(pro hac vice) 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 455-2000 Facsimile: (212) 455-2502 Email: jtringali@stblaw.com pgluckow@stblaw.com 7 8 9 10 11 By 12 13 /s/ Joseph F. Tringali Joseph F. Tringali Attorneys for Defendants Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P. and Centerview Partners LLC 14 DATED: October 11, 2011 15 19 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP JAMES F. BASILE MARK E. MCKANE 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 Email: james.basile@kirkland.com mark.mckane@kirkland.com 20 By 16 17 18 21 /s/ James F. Basile James F. Basile Attorneys for Defendant Vestar Capital Partners Inc. 22 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 10/12/2011 25 DATED: ____________________ ________________________________________________ The Hon. Claudia Wilken 26 United States District Judge 27 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE – No. 11-CV-01064-CW -5- 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 2 I, Christopher M. Burke, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 3 obtained from the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United 4 States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 11th day of October, 2011 5 at San Diego, California. 6 DATED: October 11, 2011 SCOTT+SCOTT LLP 7 8 9 10 11 12 /s/ Christopher M. Burke Christopher M. Burke 707 Broadway, 10th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 233-4565 Facsimile: (619) 233-0508 E-mail: cburke@scott-scott.com An Attorney for Plaintiff Pipefitters Local Union No. 120 Pension Fund 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULES AND HEARING DATES – No. 11-CV-01064-CW -6- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on October 11, 2011, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed 3 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 4 to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I 5 caused the foregoing document or paper to be mailed via the United States Postal Service to the 6 non-CM/ECF participants indicated on the Manual Notice List. 7 8 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 11, 2011. 9 10 11 12 13 14 /s/ Christopher M. Burke CHRISTOPHER M. BURKE SCOTT+SCOTT LLP 707 Broadway, 10th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619-233-4565 Fax: 619-233-0508 E-mail: cburke@scott-scott.com 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES, BRIEFING SCHEDULES AND HEARING DATES – No. 11-CV-01064-CW -7-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
