Holman v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
169
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #168 Stipulation Extending Experian's Deadline to Respond to Discovery.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Daniel J. McLoon (State Bar No. 109598)
Michael G. Morgan (State Bar No. 170611)
JONES DAY
555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300
Telephone:
(213) 489-3939
Facsimile:
(213) 243-2539
Email: djmcloon@JonesDay.com
mgmorgan@JonesDay.com
Attorneys for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ROANE HOLMAN, and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.; FINEX GROUP LLC,
Defendants.
Case No. CV-11-00180-CW (DMR)
Assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M.
Ryu for Discovery
JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER
EXTENDING EXPERIAN’S
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
DISCOVERY
AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING
EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
DISCOVERY
1
Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) and Plaintiffs Roane
2
Holman, Narcisco Navarro Hernandez, and Miguel A. Alvarez (“Plaintiffs” and, together with
3
Experian, the “Parties”) submit this Joint Request for Order Extending Experian’s Deadline to
4
Respond to Discovery.
5
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu held a hearing on
6
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel responses to Plaintiffs’ second set of requests for admissions and
7
fourth set of interrogatories directed to Experian and, as confirmed in her written order dated June
8
27, 2012, “the parties were ordered to complete the subject discovery within 90 days of the
9
hearing”—i.e., by September 12, 2012—“and were instructed to meet and confer if any further
10
11
extension of time became necessary.” See Docket 154, 160.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ second set of requests for admissions and fourth set of
12
interrogatories seek discovery related to whether each of 36,387 putative class members asked to
13
have their vehicles towed or had their towing charges judicially established.
14
15
16
WHEREAS, the parties have not completed their discovery of Finex’s documents and
their review of that information.
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it would be premature for Experian to attempt to
17
respond to Plaintiffs’ second set of requests for admissions and fourth set of interrogatories and
18
that Experian will need at least two more months to respond to that discovery.
19
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties request the Court to extend Experian’s deadline to
20
respond to that discovery for sixty days, up to and including November 13, 2012. The Parties
21
will continue to meet and confer regarding additional extensions.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING
EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
DISCOVERY
1
Dated: August 16, 2012
JONES DAY
2
3
By: /s/ Michael G. Morgan
Michael G. Morgan
4
Attorneys for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.
5
6
7
Dated: August 16, 2012
ANDERSON OGILVIE & BREWER LLP
8
9
10
11
12
By: /s/ Andrew J. Ogilvie
Andrew J. Ogilvie
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROANE HOLMAN, NARCISCO
NAVARRO HERNANDEZ, MIGUEL A.
ALVAREZ and all others similarly situated
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING
EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
DISCOVERY
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to the Parties’ request and good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows:
3
1.
Experian’s deadline to respond to the Plaintiffs’ fourth set of
4
interrogatories and second set of requests for admissions is hereby
5
extended for sixty days, up to and including November 13, 2012.
10
August 17, 2012
Dated:_______________________
S
NO
.
Donna M. Ryu
. Ryu
Magistrate Judge of the ge DonnDistrict of California
Northern a M
12
RT
14
ER
H
13
Jud
LAI-3174141v1
A
11
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
FO
9
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
extensions of the deadline.
7
8
The Parties are directed to meet and confer regarding additional
LI
2.
UNIT
ED
6
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING
EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
DISCOVERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?