Holman v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 169

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #168 Stipulation Extending Experian's Deadline to Respond to Discovery.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Daniel J. McLoon (State Bar No. 109598) Michael G. Morgan (State Bar No. 170611) JONES DAY 555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300 Telephone: (213) 489-3939 Facsimile: (213) 243-2539 Email: djmcloon@JonesDay.com mgmorgan@JonesDay.com Attorneys for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ROANE HOLMAN, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; FINEX GROUP LLC, Defendants. Case No. CV-11-00180-CW (DMR) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for Discovery JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY 1 Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) and Plaintiffs Roane 2 Holman, Narcisco Navarro Hernandez, and Miguel A. Alvarez (“Plaintiffs” and, together with 3 Experian, the “Parties”) submit this Joint Request for Order Extending Experian’s Deadline to 4 Respond to Discovery. 5 WHEREAS, on June 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu held a hearing on 6 Plaintiffs’ motion to compel responses to Plaintiffs’ second set of requests for admissions and 7 fourth set of interrogatories directed to Experian and, as confirmed in her written order dated June 8 27, 2012, “the parties were ordered to complete the subject discovery within 90 days of the 9 hearing”—i.e., by September 12, 2012—“and were instructed to meet and confer if any further 10 11 extension of time became necessary.” See Docket 154, 160. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ second set of requests for admissions and fourth set of 12 interrogatories seek discovery related to whether each of 36,387 putative class members asked to 13 have their vehicles towed or had their towing charges judicially established. 14 15 16 WHEREAS, the parties have not completed their discovery of Finex’s documents and their review of that information. WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it would be premature for Experian to attempt to 17 respond to Plaintiffs’ second set of requests for admissions and fourth set of interrogatories and 18 that Experian will need at least two more months to respond to that discovery. 19 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties request the Court to extend Experian’s deadline to 20 respond to that discovery for sixty days, up to and including November 13, 2012. The Parties 21 will continue to meet and confer regarding additional extensions. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY 1 Dated: August 16, 2012 JONES DAY 2 3 By: /s/ Michael G. Morgan Michael G. Morgan 4 Attorneys for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 5 6 7 Dated: August 16, 2012 ANDERSON OGILVIE & BREWER LLP 8 9 10 11 12 By: /s/ Andrew J. Ogilvie Andrew J. Ogilvie Attorneys for Plaintiff ROANE HOLMAN, NARCISCO NAVARRO HERNANDEZ, MIGUEL A. ALVAREZ and all others similarly situated 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the Parties’ request and good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 3 1. Experian’s deadline to respond to the Plaintiffs’ fourth set of 4 interrogatories and second set of requests for admissions is hereby 5 extended for sixty days, up to and including November 13, 2012. 10 August 17, 2012 Dated:_______________________ S NO . Donna M. Ryu . Ryu Magistrate Judge of the ge DonnDistrict of California Northern a M 12 RT 14 ER H 13 Jud LAI-3174141v1 A 11 D RDERE OO IT IS S FO 9 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA extensions of the deadline. 7 8 The Parties are directed to meet and confer regarding additional LI 2. UNIT ED 6 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JOINT REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING EXPERIAN’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?